Table 1

Summary of main studies relating to multivessel PCI in STEMI patients with CGS

Study (year)Study typeMain findings
Culprit-Shock trial (2017)17 18 RCT
(n=703).
In patients with CGS due to AMI (62% STEMI), the composite endpoint of 30-day death or severe renal failure was lower in the culprit lesion only revascularisation group compared to the group with immediate multivessel PCI (45.9 vs 55.4%, RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96, p=0.01).
Pasceri et al (2018)14 Meta-analysis including 11 randomised trials (n=3561).In STEMI patients with CGS and multivessel disease, a strategy of complete revascularisation had less death or AMI than those with PCI only to the culprit artery (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.99, p=0.04).
Kolte et al (2017)13 Meta-analysis including 11 non-randomised studies (n=5850).Multivessel PCI did not affect short-term or long-term mortality in STEMI patients with CGS compared to culprit artery only PCI (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.43, p=0.61) and (OR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.30, p=0.43), respectively.
There was a non-significant trend toward higher in-hospital stroke (OR: 1.64, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.72, p=0.06) and renal failure (OR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.72, p=0.06) in the multivessel PCI group compared to the culprit artery only PCI group.
KAMIR-NIH Registry (2018)16 Registry
(n=659).
In STEMI patients with CGS and multivessel disease, patients with complete revascularisation had lower all-cause death and non-culprit artery repeat revascularisation than patients with PCI only to the culprit artery (21.3 vs 31.7%, HR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.82, p=0.001).
British Columbia Cardiac Registry (2018)15 Registry
(n=649).
In patients with AMI (72% STEMI), CGS and multivessel disease, PCI only to the culprit artery was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (HR=0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88, p=0.009) and 1 year (HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96, p=0.027).
Euro-Heart Survey PCI Registry (2012)12 Registry
(n=336).
In STEMI patients with CGS, there was a non-statistically significant increase in-hospital mortality with multivessel PCI versus culprit artery only PCI (48.8% vs 37.4%, p=0.07). However, on multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference between groups (OR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.28).
Manitoba Cardiogenic Shock Registry (2011)9 Registry
(n=210).
Complete revascularisation during index hospitalisation for STEMI with CGS was an independent predictor of survival to hospital discharge (OR: 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.2, p=0.03).
Mylotte et al (2013)10 Multicentre prospective observational study (n=266).STEMI patients with CGS or resuscitated cardiac arrest who underwent multivessel PCI had greater 6-month survival compared to those with culprit artery only PCI (43.9% vs 20.4%, p=0.0017).
Park et al (2015)11 Multicentre retrospective observational study
(n=510).
STEMI patients with CGS and multivessel PCI had lower in-hospital mortality than those in the culprit artery only PCI group (2.4% vs 9.3%, HR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.46, p<0.001).
  • CGS, cardiogenic shock; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT, randomised clinical trial; RR, relative risk; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.