Table 3

Multiple-adjusted coronary heart disease relative risks (and 95% CIs) for women and men, comparing those with, to those without, diabetes, by study

StudyWomenMen
Adventist2.15 (1.33 to 3.47)2.11 (1.12 to 4.00)
APCSC (ANZ)2.01 (1.55 to 2.60)1.58 (1.32 to 1.90)
APCSC (Asia)1.82 (1.02 to 3.25)1.47 (1.15 to 1.88)
ARIC3.16 (2.64 to 3.78)2.38 (2.02 to 2.80)
Collins (Indians)20.70 (2.51 to 171)3.15 (1.29 to 7.69)
Collins (Melanesians)5.36 (1.18 to 24.3)1.60 (0.43 to 5.97)
DECODE2.48 (1.69 to 3.65)2.09 (1.55 to 2.82)
Dubbo1.67 (1.12 to 2.48)1.53 (0.99 to 2.37)
EPESE3.20 (1.46 to 7.01)1.75 (0.97 to 3.16)
Framingham5.4 (2.4 to 12.3)6.1 (3.4 to 10.9)
Hawaii/LA/Hisoshima3.29 (1.79 to 6.55)1.54 (1.03 to 2.25)
Hisayama3.46 (1.59 to 7.54)1.26 (0.67 to 2.35)
HUNT I2.50 (2.10 to 2.80)1.80 (1.60 to 2.10)
Kuopio and N Karelia4.89 (3.84 to 6.24)2.11 (1.70 to 2.63)
NHANES I2.59 (1.59 to 4.22)2.37 (1.55 to 3.62)
NHANES III2.53 (1.62 to 3.97)1.29 (0.91 to 1.85)
Renfrew and Paisley1.97 (1.27 to 3.08)1.17 (0.78 to 1.74)
Reykjavik2.23 (1.50 to 3.32)1.34 (0.97 to 1.87)
SHHEC3.06 (2.18 to 4.27)2.49 (1.84 to 3.37)
Strong2.26 (1.73 to 2.96)1.66 (1.30 to 2.12)
Takayama0.49 (0.07 to 3.57)2.96 (1.59 to 5.50)
  • For citations to the studies (identified here by authors or study names), see Peters et al ,18 from where the data were obtained.