Table 2

Comparison of opportunity scores, by randomised treatment allocation

Opportunity scoreEnhanced self-management
(control)
Supported medical management
(intervention)
P values
Reduced EF (n=61) mean (95% CI)Preserved EF (n=40) mean (95% CI)Reduced EF (n=62) mean (95% CI)Preserved EF (n=39) mean (95% CI)P for reduced EFP for preserved EF
Opportunity score at the baseline0.52 (0.45 to 0.58)0.54 (0.42 to 0.67)0.53 (0.45 to 0.61)0.53 (0.40 to 0.65)0.890.90
Opportunity score at the end0.55 (0.49 to 0.61)0.54 (0.40 to 0.67)0.63 (0.56 to 0.70)0.57 (0.42 to 0.72)0.080.77
Change in opportunity score0.04 (−0.006 to 0.08)−0.003 (−0.06 to 0.05)0.09 (0.04 to 0.14)0.07 (−0.04 to 0.18)0.130.24
Weighted opportunity score at the baseline0.52 (0.44 to 0.60)0.53 (0.43 to 0.62)0.87
Weighted opportunity score at the end0.54 (0.46 to 0.62)0.61 (0.52 to 0.70)0.25
Change in weighted opportunity score0.02 (−0.01 to 0.07)0.08 (0.02 to 0.15)0.20
  • *End: after 6 months; change: the first measurement after 6 months minus the first measurement after randomisation.

  • EF, ejection fraction.