Table 1

Summary of pivotal trials for antithrombotic agents

StudyNumber of patientsAgent usedIndicationTreatment durationPrimary end pointSafety end point
PLATO
2009
18 624Aspirin+Ticagrelor
vs
Asprin+Clopidogrel
ACS with or without ST elevation12 monthsDeath/ MI/stroke
9.8% Ticagrelor
11.7% Clopidogrel
P<0.001
Major bleeding
11.6% Ticagrelor
11.2% Clopidogrel
P=0.43
TRITON
2007
13 608
(STEMI=3534)l
Aspirin+Prasugrel
vs
Aspirin+Clopidogrel
ACS
99% patients had PCI
6–15 monthsDeath/MI/non-fatal MI and stroke
9.9%—Prasugrel
12.1% Clopidogrel
P<0.001
Major bleeding
2.4%—Prasugrel
1.8% Clopidogrel
P=0.03
Life-threatening bleed
1.4%—Prasugrel
0.9% Clopidogrel
CURE
2001
12 562Aspirin+Clopidogrel
vs
Aspirin+Prasugrel
ACS without ST elevation3–12 monthsDeath/non-fatal stroke & MI
9.3% Clopidogrel
11.4% Prasugrel
P<0.001
Major bleeding
3.7% Clopidogrel
2.7% Prasugrel
P<0.001
CLARITY TIMI-28
2005
3491
Clopidogrel
vs
placebo
Fibrinolytic +anticoagulant+clopidogrel
vs
Fibrinolytic+clopidogrel+placebo
STEMI1 monthComposite of occlusion of infarct artery/death/MI
15% Clopidogrel
21.7% Prasugrel
P<0.001
TIMI major bleed
1.3% Clopidogrel
1.1% Prasugrel
P=0.64
OASIS-5
2007
20 078Fondaparinux
vs
Enoxaparin
ACS6 daysDeath/MI/refractory ischaemia
5.8%—Fondaparinux
5.7%—Enoxaparin
P=0.06
Major bleeding
2.2%—Fondaparinux
4.1%—Enoxaparin
P<0.001
ATLANTIC1862
STEMI
Pretreatment ticagrelor vs in-laboratory ticagrelorSTEMIEnd of PCI>70% ST segment resolution
TIMI 3 flow in infarct related artery
before PCI
No difference in coprimary endpoints
  • ACS, acute coronary syndrome; MI, Myocardial Infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.