Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study participants according to phenogroups by LCA in the derivation cohort

CharcteristicsYounger populationOlder populationP*
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5
(n=517)(n=249)(n=171)(n=461)(n=231)
Least comorbiditiesMen with LV enlargementPredominantly women rheumatic MRLow-risk order patientsHigh-risk older patients
Age (year)44 (37–51)52 (46–59)50 (39–56)64 (59–69)69 (64–74)<0.001
Men, n (%)365 (70.6)249 (100.0)36 (21.1)230 (49.9)78 (33.8)<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m²)24.1 (21.9–26.2)25.3 (23.2–27.6)22.9 (20.7–24.7)25.0 (22.8–27.2)22.7 (20.9–24.8)<0.001
Comorbidities, n (%)
Hypertension100 (19.3)91 (36.5)2 (1.2)291 (63.1)117 (50.6)<0.001
Diabetes5 (1.0)15 (6.0)2 (1.2)65 (14.1)46 (19.9)<0.001
A F48 (9.3)163 (65.5)126 (73.7)135 (29.3)165 (71.4)<0.001
Stroke3 (0.6)11 (4.4)3 (1.8)6 (1.3)9 (3.9)0.001
Myocardial infarction5 (1.0)7 (2.8)1 (0.6)5 (1.1)12 (5.2)<0.001
Year of MV surgery<0.001
2006–2013253 (48.9)118 (47.4)108 (63.2)184 (39.9)120 (51.9)
2014–2020264 (51.1)131 (52.6)63 (36.8)277 (60.1)111 (48.1)
Symptomatic MR, n (%)104 (20.1)113 (45.4)82 (48.0)148 (32.1)101 (43.7)<0.001
Symptoms, n (%)
Dyspnoea83 (16.1)94 (37.8)69 (40.4)129 (28.0)93 (40.3)<0.001
Chest pain21 (4.1)14 (5.6)6 (3.5)15 (3.3)5 (2.2)0.341
Oedema5 (1.0)6 (2.4)9 (5.3)5 (1.1)11 (4.8)<0.001
Palpitation12 (2.3)19 (7.6)17 (9.9)21 (4.6)10 (4.3)<0.001
Syncope6 (1.2)0 (0.0)2 (1.2)5 (1.1)3 (1.3)0.560
Laboratory results
Haemoglobin (g/L)140 (129–148)145 (139–154)127 (119–137)130 (120–141)120 (108–131)<0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)101.5 (92.8–110.3)85.5 (76.0–97.1)95.1 (79.3–106.5)83.3 (69.7–91.4)62.4 (48.7–79.5)<0.001
MR aetiology, n (%)<0.001
Degenerative490 (94.8)231 (92.8)51 (29.8)445 (96.5)158 (68.4)
Rheumatic21 (4.1)14 (5.6)115 (67.3)15 (3.3)71 (30.7)
Congenital6 (1.2)4 (1.6)5 (2.9)1 (0.2)2 (0.9)
Valve morphology in degenerative MR, n (%)<0.001
Isolated anterior leaflet prolapse100 (20.4)26 (11.3)18 (35.3)54 (12.2)35 (22.6)
Isolated posterior leaflet prolapse267 (54.5)138 (59.7)20 (39.2)303 (68.4)72 (46.5)
Bileaflet prolapse123 (25.1)67 (29.0)13 (25.5)86 (19.3)48 (30.4)
MR surgery type, n (%)<0.001
MV repair506 (97.9)236 (94.8)53 (31.0)445 (96.5)109 (47.2)
MV replacement (mechanical)11 (2.1)13 (5.2)109 (63.7)8 (1.7)51 (22.1)
MV replacement (bioprosthetic)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)9 (5.3)8 (1.7)71 (30.7)
Concomitant CABG, n (%)0 (0.0)15 (6.0)1 (0.6)33 (7.2)45 (19.5)<0.001
Concomitant surgical atrial ablation, n (%)44 (8.5)150 (60.2)100 (58.5)123 (26.7)138 (59.7)<0.001
  • Values are expressed in median (IQR) or numbers (percentage).

  • *Comparison between five groups.

  • †MV morphology was assessed only in the subgroup of patients with degenerative MR (unavailable in five patients).

  • AF, atrial fibrillation; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LCA, latent class analysis; LV, left ventricular; MR, mitral regurgitation; MV, mitral valve.