Table 1

Comparison of CMR data between athletes demonstrating de-novo ECG changes and athletes undergoing a mandatory CMR

Athletes undergoing mandatory CMR assessment (n=30)Athletes demonstrating de-novo ECG changes undergoing CMR assessment (n=17)P value
Age (years)26 (19–30)22 (19–25)0.094
BSA (m2)2 (1.9–2.1)2 (1.9–2.1)0.861
Symptom duration (days, 0=asymptomatic)0 (0–3)5 (3–10)0.0001*
Positive PCR to ECG11 (11–11)12 (10–14)0.298
Positive PCR to CMR11 (11–11)15 (11.5–19.5)0.005*
LVMWT (mm)10 (9–10)9 (9–11)0.770
LVEF (%)59 (57–62)60 (57–64.3)0.415
LV mass indexed (g/m2)72 (54–83)82 (65–93)0.094
RVEF (%)53 (51–60)58 (51–62.5)0.179
Presence of inflammatory cardiac sequalae015
  • Values are expressed as median (IQR).

  • *P value <0.05 deemed statistically significant.

  • BSA, body surface area; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVMWT, left ventricular maximal wall thickness; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction.