Table 4

Multivariate adjusted relative risk (95% CI) and AUC in women

Multivariate adjusted relative risk (95% CI)
StudyAUCAgeSBPSerum TCSmokingDM
The multivariate adjusted relative risks and the 95% CIs were estimated using a proportional hazards models with age, SBP, serum TC, current smoking, and DM status included as independent variables in the models. Relative risks associated with specified increments of the characteristics were calculated based on this multivariate model. The increments used were 10 years of age, 20 mm Hg SBP, 1.04 mmol/l TC, current smoking versus current non-smoker, and DM versus non-DM.
NHANES I842.95 (2.62 to 3.33)1.29 (1.21 to 1.39)1.05 (0.97 to 1.13)2.08 (1.67 to 2.58)2.50 (1.89 to 3.30)
NHANES II802.84 (2.28 to 3.55)1.35 (1.21 to 1.50)1.17 (1.05 to 1.30)1.92 (1.38 to 2.69)2.76 (1.92 to 3.97)
Framingham cohort862.26 (1.72 to 2.97)1.60 (1.32 to 1.93)1.41 (1.17 to 1.69)1.80 (1.14 to 2.82)4.67 (2.70 to 8.07)
Tecumseh community health study882.71 (2.08 to 3.53)1.48 (1.27 to 1.73)1.14 (0.94 to 1.37)1.93 (1.09 to 3.38)1.32 (0.62 to 2.82)
Renfrew and Paisley study762.68 (2.26 to 3.17)1.34 (1.27 to 1.43)1.20 (1.12 to 1.29)2.07 (1.75 to 2.45)3.65 (2.36 to 5.65)
Norwegian counties study721.71 (1.10 to 2.65)1.72 (1.51 to 1.96)1.37 (1.26 to 1.49)3.01 (2.11 to 4.28)8.67 (3.81 to 19.77)
Iceland Reykjavik study832.84 (2.39 to 3.38)1.45 (1.32 to 1.60)1.31 (1.20 to 1.43)3.34 (2.60 to 4.28)3.81 (2.25 to 6.44)
HDFP (regular care)792.74 (1.92 to 3.92)1.19 (0.99 to 1.44)1.30 (1.17 to 1.44)1.87 (1.10 to 3.18)2.57 (1.37 to 4.81)