You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 97, Issue 9
  • Radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced heart failure and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Heart rhythm disorders
Original article
Radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced heart failure and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial
  1. Michael R MacDonald1,
  2. Derek T Connelly1,2,
  3. Nathaniel M Hawkins3,
  4. Tracey Steedman4,
  5. John Payne1,
  6. Morag Shaw4,
  7. Martin Denvir5,
  8. Sai Bhagra1,
  9. Sandy Small2,
  10. William Martin2,
  11. John J V McMurray6,
  12. Mark C Petrie1
  1. 1Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  2. 2Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  3. 3Aintree Cardiac Centre, Liverpool, UK
  4. 4Western Infirmary of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  5. 5The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
  6. 6BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michael R MacDonald, Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Beardmore Street, Clydebank, Scotland G81 4HX, UK; michaelrossmacdonald{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective To determine whether or not radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced heart failure leads to improvements in cardiac function.

Setting Patients were recruited from heart failure outpatient clinics in Scotland.

Design and intervention Patients with advanced heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction were randomised to RFA (rhythm control) or continued medical treatment (rate control). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months.

Main outcome measure Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by cardiovascular MRI.

Results 22 patients were randomised to RFA and 19 to medical treatment. In the RFA group, 50% of patients were in sinus rhythm at the end of the study (compared with none in the medical treatment group). The increase in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) LVEF in the RFA group was 4.5±11.1% compared with 2.8±6.7% in the medical treatment group (p=0.6). The RFA group had a greater increase in radionuclide LVEF (a prespecified secondary end point) than patients in the medical treatment group (+8.2±12.0% vs +1.4±5.9%; p=0.032). RFA did not improve N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, 6 min walk distance or quality of life. The rate of serious complications related to RFA was 15%.

Conclusions RFA resulted in long-term restoration of sinus rhythm in only 50% of patients. RFA did not improve CMR LVEF compared with a strategy of rate control. RFA did improve radionuclide LVEF but did not improve other secondary outcomes and was associated with a significant rate of serious complications.

Clinical trials registration number NCT00292162.

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • heart failure
  • radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.207340

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • See Editorial, p 687

    • Institution where work was performed: Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow.

    • Funding This work was supported by the Chief Scientist Office, Scotland (grant number CZB4475).

    • Competing interests None.

    • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the West Glasgow REC.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles