You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Featured correspondence
  1. Keith A A Fox1,
  2. Scott McLean2
  1. 1University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, The Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
  2. 2Barts and The London NHS Trust, Room 515, John Harrison House, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Keith A A Fox, University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, The Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK; k.a.a.fox{at}ed.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.207738

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The Authors' reply: We thank Drs Mamas and Fraser for their interest1 in our recent editorial in Heart on NICE guidance for the investigation of chest pain.2

    Please can we point out that our editorial referred specifically to the NICE guidance on chest pain (clinical guidance 95).3 The letter from Mamas and Fraser refers to the separate NICE guidance on unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (clinical guidance 94).4 Nevertheless, as an author (KAAF) of the GRACE risk score5 and an author (KAAF) of …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Linked articles 207712.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • PostScript
      NICE chest pain guidance
      Mamas A Mamas Douglas Fraser
      Heart 2010; 96 1859-1860 Published Online First: 28 Sep 2010. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.207712