Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life among patients post-myocardial infarction at baseline in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quality of life ancillary study was incorporated into the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial of captopril versus placebo among patients who survived an acute myocardial infarction with compromised ventricular functioning, but no overt heart failure. Assessments included patient symptoms, health perceptions, emotional, cognitive, social and sexual levels of functloning, as well as potential covariates, such as life events and social support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the quality of life measures in the SAVE at baseline, and provide a pre-randomization profile of the SAVE patients. One hundred and eighty-four patients participated in this aspect of the trial. Reliability alpha coefficlents were adequate or better for all questionnaires, except for life events and sexual activities. Consistent with prior studies, the quality of life parameters were uncorrelated with ventricular ejection fraction. Despite experiencing a recent myocardial infarction with compromised ventricular functioning, patients at baseline generally nelther appeared depressed nor focused on symptoms. The baseline findings support the inclusion of the quality of life ancillary study in the overall SAVE trial because of the independent contribution likely to be achieved in terms of evaluating both disease progression and treatment efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guyatt GH, Thompson PH, Berman LB, et al. How should we measure function in patients with chronic heart and lung disease? J Chronic Dis 1985; 18: 517–524.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tandon PK, Stander H, Dyke SH, et al. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled drug trial. Heart Failure 1988; 4: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feinstein AR, Fischer MB, Pigeon JG. Changes in dyspnea-fatigue ratings as indicators of quality of life in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moye LA, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, for the SAVE Inverstigators. Design and baseline characteristics of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 700–707.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeffer MA, Lamas GA, Vaughan DE, et al. Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilation after anterior infarction. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) Investigators. Recruitment and baseline description of patients in the CAPS. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 704–713.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gorkin L, Norvell NK, Rosen R, et al. Assessment of quality of life in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: The Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 1069–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wiklund I, Gorkin L, Pawitan Y, et al. Methods for assessing quality of life in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gorkin L, Goldstein MG, Follick MJ, Lefebvre RC. Strategies for enhancing adherence in clinical trials. In: SAShumaker, EBSchron and JKOckene (Eds.), The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. New York: Springer, 1990: 361–375.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989; 262: 907–913.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Charles D, Wayne JB, Oberman A, et al. Costs and benefits associated with treatment for coronary artery disease. Circulation 1982; 66(Suppl III): 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE: The MOS shortform general health survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 724–735.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carney RM, Rich MW, Tevelde A, et al. Major depressive disorder in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 1273–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787–805.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Follick MJ, Gorkin L, Smith TW, et al. Quality of life post-myocardial infarction: Effects of a transtelephonic coronary intervention system. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wechsler D. WAIS-R Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reitan RM. Validity of the Trails Making Test as an indication of organic brain damage. Percept Motor Skills 1958; 8: 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Russell DW. A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory functions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1975; 43: 800–809.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, et al. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1657–1664.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruberman W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD, Chaudhary BS. Psychosocial influences on mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 552–559.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blumenthal JA, Burg M, Barefoot J, et al. Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease. Psychom Med 1987; 49: 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karnofsky DA, Abelmann WH, Craver LF, Burchenal JH. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of cancer. Cancer 1948; 1: 634–656.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha in the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gorkin L, Schron EB, Handshaw KS, et al. Clinical trial enrollers versus nonenrollers: The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT). Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials, Philadelphia, PA, 1992.

  27. Ahern DK, Gorkin L, Anderson JL, et al. Biobehavioral variables and mortality or cardiac arrest in the Cardiac Arrhythmia pilot Study (CAPS). Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simons LH, Cunningham S, Catanzare M. Emotional responses and experiences of wives of men who survive a sudden cardiac event. Cardiovascular Nurs 1992; 28: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Franciosa JA, Park M, Levine TB. Lack of correlation between exercise capacity and indexes of resting left ventricular performance in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1981; 47: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Willens HJ, Blevins RD, Wrisley D, et al. The prognostic value of functional capacity in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Am Heart J 1987; 114: 337–382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant provided by the Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorkin, L., Follick, M.J., Geltman, E. et al. Quality of life among patients post-myocardial infarction at baseline in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. Qual Life Res 3, 111–119 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435254

Key words

Navigation