Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous coronary intervention triggers a systemic inflammatory response in patients treated for in-stent restenosis – comparison with stable and unstable angina

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Inflammation Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Objective and design: It is believed that the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response induced by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) impacts on the long-term outcomes in patients with stable angina (SA) and unstable angina (UA). We aimed to determine whether an inflammatory response appears in in-stent restenosis (ISR) patients undergoing balloon angioplasty and to assess its pattern and magnitude in relation to SA and UA subjects.

Subjects: 80 patients (59 with SA, 10 with UA, 11 with ISR) were enrolled into the prospective study.

Treatment: SA and UA patients undergoing single vessel coronary balloon angioplasty followed by stenting versus ISR subjects in whom only balloon angioplasty was performed.

Methods: C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) were measured in blood samples collected before and 6, 24 h and 1 month after the procedure.

Results: A comparable pattern of inflammatory response in terms of CRP and SAA concentrations in subjects undergoing PCI due to ISR and SA was discovered while in unstable patients its magnitude was substantially higher. CRP and SAA levels increased significantly in each group with the peak value at 24 h and the baseline levels remarkably correlated with the highest markers’ concentrations. In contrast, preprocedural TNF-α concentrations were higher in ISR group when compared with SA and UA patients. Additionally, in ISR group a twofold increase in their values of borderline significance at 6 h was noted. SA and UA subjects were found to have significantly lower TNF-α levels at 6 and 24 h after the intervention though the marker concentrations markedly increased with peak values at 1 month. The levels of IL-10 did not differ at any time point between the groups.

Conclusions: We suggest that PCI triggers a systemic inflammatory response in patients with ISR and considerable differences in its pattern when compared with SA and UA patients were demonstrated. Moreover, a high preprocedural TNF-α level and its increase provoked by PCI in the ISR group warrant the need for further investigation of its possible involvement in the restenosis process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kubica.

Additional information

Received 17 September 2004; returned for revison 22 November 2004; accepted by A. Falus 4 January 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kozinski, M., Krzewina-Kowalska, A., Kubica, J. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention triggers a systemic inflammatory response in patients treated for in-stent restenosis – comparison with stable and unstable angina. Inflamm. res. 54, 187–193 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-005-1342-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-005-1342-0

Key words.

Navigation