Skip to main content
Log in

Hand-held echocardiography with doppler capability for the assessment of critically-ill patients: is it reliable?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic capability of a hand-carried ultrasound device (HCU) in critically ill patients when using conventional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a reference.

Design

Prospective, descriptive study.

Setting

Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.

Patients

All patients requiring a TTE study were eligible.

Interventions

Each patient underwent an echocardiographic examination using a full-feature echocardiographic platform (Sonos 5500, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) and a small battery-operated device (SonoHeart Elite, SonoSite, Bothell, WA). The operators (level III training in echocardiography) were randomized (HCU vs. TTE) and they independently interpreted the echocardiograms at the patient bedside.

Results

During a 2-month period, 55 consecutive patients (age: 61±16 years, simplified acute physiology score 46±15, body mass index 26±7) were studied, 40 of them being mechanically ventilated (73%). The number of acoustic windows was comparable using HCU and TTE (2.3±0.8 vs. 2.4±0.8: P=0.24). The overall diagnostic accuracy of HCU was lower compared with conventional TTE (137/171 vs. 158/171 clinical questions solved: P=0.002), reaching 80% and 92%, respectively. Despite its spectral Doppler capability, HCU missed diagnoses that were adequately identified by TTE: elevated left ventricular pressure (n=2), relevant valvulopathy (n=2) and moderate (n=4) or severe (n=2) pulmonary hypertension. Acute management was altered by HCU and TTE findings in 27 patients (49%) and 28 patients (51%), respectively.

Conclusions

In this study, HCU had a lower diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional TTE, despite its spectral Doppler capability. Further studies are needed to validate these evolving diagnostic tools in critical care settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vignon P, Mentec H, Terré S, Gastinne H, Guéret P, Lemaire F (1994) Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. Chest 106:1829–1834

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spevack DM, Tunick PA, Kronzon I (2003) Hand carried echocardiography in the critical care setting. Echocardiography 20:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vignon P, Chastagner C, François B, Martaillé JF, Normand S, Bonnivard M, Gastinne H (2003) Diagnostic ability of hand-held echocardiography in ventilated critically-ill patients. Crit Care 7:R84–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rugolotto M, Chang CP, Hu B, Schnittger I, Liang DH (2002) Clinical use of cardiac ultrasound performed with a hand-carried device in patients admitted for acute cardiac care. Am J Cardiol 90:1040–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodkin GM, Spevack DM, Tunick PA, Kronzon I (2001) How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients? J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2019–2022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spencer KT, Anderson AS, Bhargava A, Bales A, Sorrentino M, Furlong K, Lang RM (2001) Physician-performed point-of-care echocardiography using a laptop platform compared with physical examination in the cardiovascular patient. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2013–2018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The Task Force on Echocardiography in Emergency Medicine of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Echocardiography and TPEC Committees of the American College of Cardiology (1999) Echocardiography in emergency medicine: a policy statement by the American Society of Echocardiography and the American College of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:82–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography (1997) A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (committee on clinical application of echocardiography). Circulation 95:1686–1744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benjamin E, Griffin K, Leibowitz AB et al. (1998) Goal-directed transesophageal echocardiography performed by intensivists to assess left ventricular function: comparison with pulmonary artery catheterization. J Cardiovasc Vasc Anesth 12:10–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cholley B, Vignon P (2002) Intérêt de l’échocardiographie Doppler pour guider le remplissage vasculaire. In: Vignon P, Goarin JP (ed) Echocardiographie Doppler en réanimation, anesthésie et médecine d’urgence. Elsevier, Paris, pp 83–101

  11. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2001) Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 119:867–873

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL (1988) Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:426–440

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rugolotto M, Chang CP, Hu B, Schnittger I, Liang DH (2002) Clinical use of cardiac ultrasound performed with a hand-carried device in patients admitted for acute cardiac care. Am Heart J 90:1040–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vourvouri EC, Poldermans D, De Sutter J, Sozzi FB, Izzo P, Roelandt JRTC (2002) Experience with an ultrasound stethoscope. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruce CJ, Montgomery SC, Bailey KR, Tajik J, Seward JB (2002) Utility of hand-carried ultrasound devices used by cardiologists with and without significant echocardiographic experience in the cardiology inpatients and outpatients settings. Am J Cardiol 90:1273–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rugulotto M, Hu BS, Liang DH, Schnittger I (2001) Rapid assessment of cardiac anatomy and function with a new hand-carried ultrasound device (OptigoTM): a comparison with standard echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiography 2:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kimura BJ, Amundson SA, Willis CL, Gilpin EA, DeMaria AN (2002) Usefulness of a hand-held ultrasound device for bedside examination of left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 90:1038–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Osranek M, Bursi F, O’Leary PW, Bruce CJ, Sinak LJ, Chandrasekaran K, Seward JB (2003) Hand-carried ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis and thoracocentesis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin JM (1999) Power Doppler. Eur Radiol 9:S318–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank SonoSite, France for their technical help in this study. The authors are grateful to all attending physicians and nurses of our department for their continuous help during this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Vignon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vignon, P., Frank, M.B.J., Lesage, J. et al. Hand-held echocardiography with doppler capability for the assessment of critically-ill patients: is it reliable?. Intensive Care Med 30, 718–723 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2128-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2128-x

Keywords

Navigation