Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical properties of metallic stents: How do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions?

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To assess selected balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents for radial force, flexibility, radio-opacity, and trackability, and to relate these physical characteristics to potential indications for placement.

Methods: Force-strain curves were plotted for each stent and the force required to produce 50% luminal narrowing was recorded. The ability of the stent to show elastic recoil following deformation was also noted. Flexibility was measured by bending the stents against a force transducer and recording the force required per degree of flexion. Radio-opacity was measured by comparing each stent against a standard aluminum step wedge. Trackability was measured by testing the ability of the stent on its delivery system to track over angles of 90° and 60°.

Results: The balloon-expandable stents showed greater radial strength and radio-opacity but, apart from the AVE Iliac Bridge stent, showed poorer flexibility and trackability. The self-expanding stents showed less radial force but were able to re-expand following deformity. They were generally more flexible and had better trackability but lower radio-opacity.

Conclusion: There is no stent which exhibits all the ideal properties required and therefore the interventionist will need to keep a range of stents available if all lesions are to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lossef S, Lutz R, Mundorf J, Barth K (1994) Comparison of mechanical deformation properties of metallic stents with use of stress-strain analysis. J Vase Interv Radiol 5:341–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry JL, Newman VS, Ferrario CM, Routh WD, Dean RH (1996) A method to evaluate the elastic behaviour of vascular stents. J Vase Interv Radiol 7:381–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flueckiger F, Sternthal H, Klem GE, Aschauer M, Szolar D, Klemhappl G (1994) Strength, elasticity and plasticity of expandable metal stents: In vitro studies with three types of stress. J Vase Interv Radioi 5:745–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oberg E, Jones FD, Horton HL (1984) Strength of materials. In: (ed) Machinery’s Hand Book, 22nd revised edn. Industrial Press, New York, pp 240–241

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gotman I (1997) Characteristics of metals used in implants. J Endourol 11:383–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shabalovskaya SA (1996) On the nature of the biocompatibility and on medical applications of N1T1 shape, memory and superelastic alloys. Biomed Mater Eng 6:267–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryhanen J, Nicmi E, Serlo W, Niemela E, Sandvik P, Pernu H, Salo T (1997) Biocompatibility of nickel-titanium shape memory metal and its corrosion behaviour in human cell cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 35: 451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Palmaz JC, Windeler SA, Garcia F, Tio F, Sibbitt RR, Renter S (1986) Atherosclerotic rabbit aortas: Expandible intraluminal grafting. Radiology 160:723–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dyet, J.F., Watts, W.G., Ettles, D.F. et al. Mechanical properties of metallic stents: How do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23, 47–54 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709910007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709910007

Key words

Navigation