Abstract
Recently a new method has been proposed as a tool to measure arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of the stiffness of the large arteries and an emerging parameter used as indicator of clinical cardiovascular risk. The method is based on measurement of brachial blood pressure during supra-systolic pressure inflation of a simple brachial cuff [the device is known as the Arteriograph (Tensiomed, Budapest, Hungary)]. This occlusion yields pronounced first and secondary peaks in the pressure waveform, the latter ascribed to a reflection from the aortic bifurcation, and PWV is calculated as the ratio of twice the jugulum-symphysis distance and the time difference between the two peaks. To test the validity of this working principle, we used a numerical model of the arterial tree to simulate pressures and flows in the normal configuration, and in a configuration with an occluded brachial artery. A pronounced secondary peak was indeed found in the brachial pressure signal of the occluded model, but its timing was only related to brachial stiffness and not to aortic stiffness. We also compared PWV’s calculated with three different methods: PWVATG (~Arteriograph principle), PWVcar–fem (~carotid–femoral PWV, the current clinical gold standard method), and PWVtheor (~Bramwell–Hill equation). Both PWVATG (R 2 = 0.94) and PWVcar–fem (R 2 = 0.95) correlated well with PWVtheor, but their numerical values were lower (by 2.17 ± 0.42 and 1.08 ± 0.70 m/s for PWVATG and PWVcar–fem, respectively). In conclusion, our simulations question the working principle of the Arteriograph. Our data indicate that the method picks up wave reflection phenomena confined to the brachial artery, and derived values of PWV rather reflect the stiffness of the brachial arteries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baulmann, J., U. Schillings, S. Rickert, S. Uen, R. Dusing, M. Illyes, A. Cziraki, G. Nickering, and T. Mengden. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. J. Hypertens. 26:523–528, 2008.
Benyu, J., L. Baoming, K. L. McNeill, and P. J. Chowienczyk. Measurement of pulse wave velocity using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound: comparison with arterial tonometry. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34:509–512, 2008.
Bjarnegard, N., and T. Lanne. Arterial properties along the upper arm in man—age-related effects and the consequence of anatomical location. J. Appl. Physiol., 2009 [epub ahead of print].
Bonny, A., F. Lacombe, M. Yitemben, B. Discazeaux, J. Donetti, P. Fahri, R. Megbemado, and B. Estampes. The 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J. Hypertens. 26:825–826, 2008.
Bramwell, J. C., and A. V. Hill. The velocity of the pulse wave in man. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 93:298–306, 1922.
Chiu, Y. C., P. W. Arand, S. G. Shroff, T. Feldman, and J. D. Carroll. Determination of pulse wave velocities with computerized algorithms. Am. Heart J. 121:1460–1470, 1991.
Horvath, I., L. Papp, and M. Illyes. Invasive validations of a user independent oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index and aortic pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 1:75–76, 2007.
Illyes, M. A new and fast screening method for measuring complex hemodynamical parameters and arterial stiffness non-invasively with a simple arm cuff. Am. J. Hypertens. 18:15A, 2005.
Laurent, S., J. Cockcroft, L. Van Bortel, P. Boutouyrie, C. Giannattasio, D. Hayoz, B. Pannier, C. Vlachopoulos, I. Wilkinson, H. Struijker-Boudier, and N.-i. European Network. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur. Heart J. 27:2588–2605, 2006.
Lehmann, E. D. Noninvasive measurements of aortic stiffness: methodological considerations. Pathol. Biol. 47:716–730, 1999.
Magometschnigg, D. Blood pressure and arterial stiffness. A comparison of two devices for measuring augmentation index and pulse wave velocity. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 155:404–410, 2005.
Millasseau, S. C., A. D. Stewart, S. J. Patel, S. R. Redwood, and P. J. Chowienczyk. Evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: influence of timing algorithm and heart rate. Hypertension 45:222–226, 2005.
Oliver, J. J., and D. J. Webb. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 23:554–566, 2003.
Parker, K. H., and C. J. H. Jones. Forward and backward running waves in the arteries—analysis using the method of characteristics. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 112:322–326, 1990.
Reymond, P., F. Merenda, F. Perren, D. Rufenacht, and N. Stergiopulos. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 297:H208–H222, 2009.
Rietzschel, E. R., M. L. De Buyzere, S. Bekaert, P. Segers, D. De Bacquer, L. Cooman, P. Van Damme, P. Cassiman, M. Langlois, P. van Oostveldt, P. Verdonck, G. De Backer, T. C. Gillebert, and I. Asklepios. Rationale, design, methods and baseline characteristics of the Asklepios Study. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 14:179–191, 2007.
Segers, P., J. Kips, B. Trachet, A. Swillens, S. Vermeersch, D. Mahieu, E. Rietzschel, M. De Buyzere, and L. Van Bortel. Limitations and pitfalls of non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure wave reflections and pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 3:79–88, 2009.
Segers, P., E. Rietzschel, S. Vermeersch, M. De Buyzere, D. De Bacquer, G. De Backer, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert, L. Bortel, and I. Asklepios. Carotid artery structure and large artery stiffness in 2524 middle-aged men and women (Asklepios study): integrating morphology and mechanics. J. Hypertens. 26:S63, 2008.
Stergiopulos, N., D. F. Young, and T. R. Rogge. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J. Biomech. 25:1477–1488, 1992.
Swillens, A., and P. Segers. Assessment of arterial pressure wave reflection: methodological considerations. Artery Res. 2:122–131, 2008.
Van Bortel, L. M., E. J. Balkestein, J. J. van der Heijden-Spek, F. H. Vanmolkot, J. A. Staessen, J. A. Kragten, J. W. Vredeveld, M. E. Safar, H. A. S. Boudier, and A. P. Hoeks. Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking. J. Hypertens. 19:1037–1044, 2001.
Vermeersch, S. J., E. R. Rietzschel, M. L. De Buyzere, D. De Bacquer, G. De Backer, L. M. Van Bortel, T. C. Gillebert, P. R. Verdonck, P. Segers, and I. Asklepios. Age and gender related patterns in carotid-femoral PWV and carotid and femoral stiffness in a large healthy, middle-aged population. J. Hypertens. 26:1411–1419, 2008.
Westerhof, N., P. Sipkema, G. C. Vandenbo, and G. Elzinga. Forward and backward waves in arterial system. Cardiovasc. Res. 6:648–656, 1972.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by a PhD grant to B. Trachet of the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Dr. Erik L. Ritman oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trachet, B., Reymond, P., Kips, J. et al. Numerical Validation of a New Method to Assess Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity from a Single Recording of a Brachial Artery Waveform with an Occluding Cuff. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 876–888 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9945-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9945-1