Skip to main content
Log in

Global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume index improve prediction of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate predictors of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients are lacking. Both left atrial volume index (LAVI) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) have been proposed as prognostic markers in HCM patients. The specific value of LAVI and GLS to predict appropriate ICD therapy in high-risk HCM patients was studied. LAVI and 2-dimensional speckle tracking-derived GLS were assessed in 92 HCM patients undergoing ICD implantation (69 % men, mean age 50 ± 14 years). During long-term follow-up, appropriate ICD therapies, defined as antitachycardia pacing and/or shock for ventricular arrhythmia, were recorded. Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 21 patients (23 %) during a median follow-up of 4.7 (2.2–8.2) years. Multivariate analysis revealed LAVI (p = 0.03) and GLS (p = 0.04) to be independent predictors of appropriate ICD therapy. Both LAVI and GLS showed higher accuracy to predict appropriate ICD therapy compared to presence of ≥1 conventional sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk factor(s) [area under the curve 0.76 (95 % CI 0.65–0.87) and 0.65 (95 % CI 0.54–0.77) versus 0.52 (95 % CI 0.43–0.58) respectively, p < 0.001]. No patient with both LAVI <34 mL/m2 and GLS <−14 % experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Assessment of both LAVI and GLS on top of conventional SCD risk factors provided incremental clinical predictive value for appropriate ICD therapy, as shown by likelihood ratio test (p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement index (0.17, p < 0.001). LAVI and GLS provide high negative predictive value for appropriate ICD therapy in high-risk HCM patients. Additionally to conventional SCD risk factors, both parameters may be useful to optimize criteria and timing for ICD implantation in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maron BJ, Spirito P, Shen WK et al (2007) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and prevention of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. JAMA 298:405–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 124:e783–e831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schinkel AF, Vriesendorp PA, Sijbrands EJ, Jordaens LJ, ten Cate FJ, Michels M (2012) Outcome and complications after implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Heart Fail 5:552–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maron BJ (2010) Contemporary insights and strategies for risk stratification and prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 121:445–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Serri K, Reant P, Lafitte M et al (2006) Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two-dimensional strain: application in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1175–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kato TS, Noda A, Izawa H et al (2004) Discrimination of nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy on the basis of strain rate imaging by tissue Doppler ultrasonography. Circulation 110:3808–3814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP et al (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:277–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maron BJ, Maron MS (2012) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet 381:242–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paraskevaidis IA, Farmakis D, Papadopoulos C et al (2009) Two-dimensional strain analysis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and normal systolic function: a 12-month follow-up study. Am Heart J 158:444–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito M, Okayama H, Yoshii T et al (2012) Clinical significance of global two-dimensional strain as a surrogate parameter of myocardial fibrosis and cardiac events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:617–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Losi MA, Betocchi S, Barbati G et al (2009) Prognostic significance of left atrial volume dilatation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tani T, Yagi T, Kitai T et al (2011) Left atrial volume predicts adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 9:34

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang H, Woo A, Monakier D et al (2005) Enlarged left atrial volume in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a marker for disease severity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang WI, Shim CY, Kim YJ et al (2009) Left atrial volume index: a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1338–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Antoni ML, Mollema SA, Delgado V et al (2010) Prognostic importance of strain and strain rate after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 31:1640–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al (2009) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:107–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr., D’Agostino RB Jr., Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172; discussion 207–112

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Mahony C, Tome-Esteban M, Lambiase PD et al (2013) A validation study of the 2003 American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology and 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association risk stratification and treatment algorithms for sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 99:534–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bos JM, Maron BJ, Ackerman MJ et al (2010) Role of family history of sudden death in risk stratification and prevention of sudden death with implantable defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 106:1481–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Mahony C, Lambiase PD, Quarta G et al (2012) The long-term survival and the risks and benefits of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 98:116–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Prinz C, Vogt J, Bitter T et al (2010) Incidence of adequate ICD interventions in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy supposed to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Acta Cardiol 65:521–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Syska P, Przybylski A, Chojnowska L et al (2010) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: efficacy and complications of the therapy in long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 21:883–889

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vriesendorp PA, Schinkel AF, Van Cleemput J et al (2013) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: patient outcomes, rate of appropriate and inappropriate interventions, and complications. Am Heart J 166:496–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woo A, Monakier D, Harris L et al (2007) Determinants of implantable defibrillator discharges in high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 93:1044–1045

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bruder O, Wagner A, Jensen CJ et al (2010) Myocardial scar visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts major adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:875–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Hanlon R, Grasso A, Roughton M et al (2010) Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:867–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bauer F, Shiota T, White RD et al (2004) Determinant of left atrial dilation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:968–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nistri S, Olivotto I, Betocchi S et al (2006) Prognostic significance of left atrial size in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (from the Italian Registry for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy). Am J Cardiol 98:960–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Mahony C, Jichi F, Pavlou M et al (2013) A novel clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM Risk-SCD). Eur Heart J. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht439

  33. Tsang TS, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME et al (2006) Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1018–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cha YM, Gersh BJ, Maron BJ et al (2007) Electrophysiologic manifestations of ventricular tachyarrhythmias provoking appropriate defibrillator interventions in high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 18:483–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Mahony C, Lambiase PD, Rahman SM et al (2012) The relation of ventricular arrhythmia electrophysiological characteristics to cardiac phenotype and circadian patterns in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Europace 14:724–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Philippe Debonnaire is supported by a Sadra Medical Research Grant (Boston Scientific) and holds a European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Research Grant for 2013. Dr. Darryl Leong is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council and the National Heart Foundation of Australia. Dr. Emer Joyce holds a European Society of Cardiology Clinical Training Grant. Dr. Spyridon Katsanos is supported by the Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Dr. Victoria Delgado received consulting fees from St. Jude Medical and Medtronic. The Department of Cardiology of Leiden University Medical Centre received research grants from Biotronik, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Edwards Lifesciences, St. Jude Medical, GE Healthcare. No specific financial support for this work is involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Debonnaire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debonnaire, P., Thijssen, J., Leong, D.P. et al. Global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume index improve prediction of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 549–558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0378-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0378-z

Keywords

Navigation