Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of risk factors for developing incident aortic stenosis: the Tromsø Study

  • CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To disclose risk factors of incident aortic stenosis (AS) and progression of established AS. A prospective cohort study. The Tromsø Study, a population based health survey. Over a 14 years span we performed three repeated echocardiographic examinations (1994, 2001 and 2008) of a random sample of initially 3,243 participants. Data from the only hospital serving this population were included in the follow up. Throughout the study 132 participants were diagnosed with incident AS, defined as mean aortic valve gradient ≥15 mmHg. Cox proportional hazards regression disclosed age (HR 1.11, 95 %CI 1.08–1.14), systolic blood pressure (BP) (HR 1.01, 95 % CI 1.00–1.02), active smoking (HR 1.71, 95 % CI 1.09–2.67), and waist circumference (HR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00–1.03) as independent predictors of incident AS. Analysis of risk factors for progression of AS disclosed a higher mean aortic gradient at first measurement (p = 0.015), weight (p = 0.015), a low haemoglobin (Hgb) (p = 0.030) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) (p = 0.032) as significant independent predictors. Age, systolic BP, smoking and waist circumference were independent predictors of incident AS, whereas cholesterol was not. Mean aortic gradient at first measurement, weight, an elevated HDL and low Hgb increase the progression rate of the disease. Our data indicate that calcific aortic valve disease is a distinct pathophysiological process, with age, smoking and “wear and tear” of the valve being major contributors to the disease development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman RV, Otto CM. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation. 2005;111(24):3316–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(3):630–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21(5):1220–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromso study. Heart. 2012;. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtz CE, Otto CM. Aortic stenosis: clinical aspects of diagnosis and management, with 10 illustrative case reports from a 25-year experience. Medicine. 2010;89(6):349–79. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3181fe5648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan KL. Is aortic stenosis a preventable disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(4):593–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobsen BK, Eggen AE, Mathiesen EB, Wilsgaard T, Njolstad I. Cohort profile: the Tromso study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr049.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Katz R, et al. Kidney function and aortic valve and mitral annular calcification in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(3):412–20. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz R, Wong ND, Kronmal R, et al. Features of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus as predictors of aortic valve calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006;113(17):2113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stritzke J, Linsel-Nitschke P, Markus MR, et al. Association between degenerative aortic valve disease and long-term exposure to cardiovascular risk factors: results of the longitudinal population-based KORA/MONICA survey. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(16):2044–53. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perkovic V, Hunt D, Griffin SV, du Plessis M, Becker GJ. Accelerated progression of calcific aortic stenosis in dialysis patients. Nephron Clin Prac. 2003;94(2):c40–5. doi:10.1159/000071280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahler RC, Desser DR, Finkelhor RS, Brener SJ, Youssefi M. Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84(9):1044–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palta S, Pai AM, Gill KS, Pai RG. New insights into the progression of aortic stenosis: implications for secondary prevention. Circulation. 2000;101(21):2497–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(9):611–7. doi:10.1056/nejm200008313430903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nassimiha D, Aronow WS, Ahn C, Goldman ME. Association of coronary risk factors with progression of valvular aortic stenosis in older persons. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(11):1313–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto K, Yamamoto H, Yoshida K, et al. Prognostic factors for progression of early- and late-stage calcific aortic valve disease in Japanese: the Japanese Aortic Stenosis Study (JASS) Retrospective Analysis. Hypertens Res. 2010;33(3):269–74. doi:10.1038/hr.2009.225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1343–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ, et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(23):2389–97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, et al. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1291–5. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000140723.15274.53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Antonini-Canterin F, Hirsu M, Popescu BA, et al. Stage-related effect of statin treatment on the progression of aortic valve sclerosis and stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):738–42. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Elevated lipoprotein(a) and risk of aortic valve stenosis in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(5):470–7. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thanassoulis G, Campbell CY, Owens DS, et al. Genetic associations with valvular calcification and aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(6):503–12. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1109034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, Gown AM, O’Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994;90(2):844–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hermans H, Herijgers P, Holvoet P, et al. Statins for calcific aortic valve stenosis: into oblivion after SALTIRE and SEAS? An extensive review from bench to bedside. Curre Probl Cardiol. 2010;35(6):284–306. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2010.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. 1997;95(9):2262–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yetkin E, Waltenberger J. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2009;135(1):4–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ortlepp JR, Hoffmann R, Ohme F, Lauscher J, Bleckmann F, Hanrath P. The vitamin D receptor genotype predisposes to the development of calcific aortic valve stenosis. Heart. 2001;85(6):635–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dweck MR, Khaw HJ, Sng GK, et al. Aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis, and skeletal bone: is there a common link with calcification and inflammation? Eur Heart J. 2013;34(21):1567–74. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2005;111(7):920–5. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000155623.48408.c5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tom Wilsgård for statistical support. This study was supported by the Northern Norway Regional Health Authorities (PhD Grant Number SFP-727-08).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gry Wisthus Eveborn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eveborn, G.W., Schirmer, H., Lunde, P. et al. Assessment of risk factors for developing incident aortic stenosis: the Tromsø Study. Eur J Epidemiol 29, 567–575 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9936-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9936-x

Keywords

Navigation