Skip to main content
Log in

Late Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Provides Benefit to Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess whether late remote ischemic preconditioning (L-RIPC) is effective in myocardial protection in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). L-RIPC is exerted by newly synthesized cardioprotective proteins. The cardioprotective effects of L-RIPC are more durable. 200 consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI were randomized to receive L-RIPC (induced by three 5-minute inflations of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mmHg around the upper arm, followed by 5-min intervals of reperfusion) or control (an uninflated cuff around the arm) at 18 h before PCI. Creatine phosphokinase (CK), its cardiac isoenzyme (CK-MB), troponin I (TNI), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured at 24 h after PCI. Adverse events’ rates at 6 months were assessed. Compared with the control group, patients in L-RIPC group were observed with significantly lower incidences in Chest pain score >1 and ECG ST deviation >1 mm (P < 0.05). The median TNI, CK, and CK-MB concentrations at 24 h were lower in the L-RIPC group (0.009 vs. 0.036 ng/mL, 123 vs. 186 IU/L, 15 vs. 27 IU/L; P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in hs-CRP between two groups. At 6 months, the adverse events’ rate was lower in the L-RIPC group (P = 0.036). L-RIPC is effective in myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective PCI and reduces adverse events’ rate at 6 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szijártó, A., Czigány, Z., Turóczi, Z., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic perconditioning-a simple, low-risk method to decrease ischemic reperfusion injury: Models, protocols and mechanistic background. Journal of Surgical Research, 178, 797–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghaemian, A., Nouraei, S. M., Abdollahian, F., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic preconditioning in percutaneous coronary revascularization: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, 20, 548–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bøtker, H. E., Kharbanda, R., Schmidt, M. R., et al. (2010). Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A randomised trial. Lancet, 375, 727–734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nageh, T., Sherwood, R. A., Harris, B. M., et al. (2005). Prognostic role of cardiac troponin I after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary disease. Heart, 91, 1181–1185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hausenloy, D. J., Mwamure, P. K., Venugopal, V., et al. (2007). Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 370, 575–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt, M. R., Sloth, A. D., Johnsen, J., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic conditioning: The cardiologist’s perspective. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Hagerstown), 13, 667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiao, S., Xie, H., Wang, C., et al. (2012). Delayed anesthetic preconditioning protects against myocardial infarction via activation of nuclear factor-κB and upregulation of autophagy. Journal of Anesthesia, 27, 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kocsis, G. F., Sárközy, M., Bencsik, P., et al. (2012). Preconditioning protects the heart in a prolonged uremic condition. American Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 303, H1229–H1236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed, L. A., Salem, H. A., Mawsouf, M. N., et al. (2012). Cardioprotective effects of ozone oxidative preconditioning in an in vivo model of ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 72, 345–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Minamino, T. (2012). Cardioprotection from ischemia/reperfusion injury: basic and translational research. Circulation Journal, 76, 1074–1082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Millar, P. J., & McGowan, C. L. (2012). Serial remote ischemic preconditioning and rhythmic isometric exercise training: A hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses, 78, 822–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loukogeorgakis, S. P., Williams, R., Panagiotidou, A. T., et al. (2007). Transient limb ischemia induces remote preconditioning and remote postconditioning in humans by a K(ATP)-channel dependent mechanism. Circulation, 116, 1386–1395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duan, X., Ji, B., Wang, X., et al. (2012). Expression of microRNA-1 and microRNA-21 in different protocols of ischemic conditioning in an isolated rat heart model. Cardiology, 122, 36–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dow, J., Bhandari, A., Simkhovich, B. Z., et al. (2012). The effect of acute versus delayed remote ischemic preconditioning on reperfusion induced ventricular arrhythmias. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 1374–1383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meybohm, P., Zacharowski, K., Cremer, J., RIP Heart-Study Investigator Group, et al. (2012). Remote ischaemic preconditioning for heart surgery. The study design for a multi-center randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial—The RIPHeart-Study. European Heart Journal, 33, 1423–1426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pilcher, J. M., Young, P., Weatherall, M., et al. (2012). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cardioprotective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in open cardiac surgery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105, 436–445.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wagner, R., Piler, P., Bedanova, H., et al. (2010). Myocardial injury is decreased by late remote ischaemic preconditioning and aggravated by tramadol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Interactive Cardio Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, 11, 758–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoole, S. P., Heck, P. M., Sharples, L., et al. (2009). Cardiac remote ischemic preconditioning in coronary stenting (CRISP stent) study: A prospective, randomized control trial. Circulation, 119, 820–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Porto, I., Selvanayagam, J. B., Van Gaal, W. J., et al. (2006). Plaque volume and occurrence and location of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from delayed-enhancement magnetic resonanceimaging, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade analysis, and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation, 114, 662–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramirez-Moreno, A., Cardenal, R., Pera, C., et al. (2004). Predictors and prognostic value of myocardial injury following stent implantation. International Journal of Cardiology, 97, 193–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brevoord, D., Kranke, P., Kuijpers, M., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic conditioning to protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 7, e42179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dm, R., Ve, H., Ge, T., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces thrombus formation in the rat. The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 10, 1538–7836.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hepponstall, M., Ignjatovic, V., Binos, S., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) Modifies plasma proteome in humans. PLoS ONE, 7, e48284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of authors have a conflict of interest.

Disclosure

The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official view of any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xun-Ming Ji.

Additional information

The authors Zhi Liu and Yan-Ling Wang have contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Wang, YL., Xu, D. et al. Late Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Provides Benefit to Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Cell Biochem Biophys 70, 437–442 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9936-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9936-1

Keywords

Navigation