Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 104, Issue 6, December 1982, Pages 1319-1327
American Heart Journal

Dual chamber sequential pacing management of sinus node dysfunction: Advantages over single-chamber pacing

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(82)90162-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Sixty-nine patients receiving atrioventricular sequential (DVI) pacemakers are compared to 67 patients receiving ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers for control of the symptoms of sinus node dysfunction. The populations were similar with comparable prepacing incidences of each assayed symptom and number of symptoms per patient (symptom density). Syncope was well controlled by both DVI and VVI pacing. DVI pacing was better than VVI pacing for control of all other symptoms. Symptom density response: DVI pre, 3.3 ± 0.95; post, 0.43 ± 0.63; VVI pre, 3.2 ± 0.97; post 1.75 ± 1.44 (p < 0.000). Atrial electrode problems were encountered in five (7.3%) of the DVI patients and one (0.74%) ventricular electrode required repositioning.

References (87)

  • AQ Chan et al.

    Re-entrant arrhythmias and concealed conduction

    Am Heart J

    (1979)
  • J Farre et al.

    Reciprocal tachycardias using accessory pathways with long conduction times

    Am J Cardiol

    (1979)
  • S Furman

    Therapeutic uses of atrial pacing

    Am Heart J

    (1973)
  • AD Johnson et al.

    Hemodynamic compromise associated with ventriculoatrial conduction following transvenous pacemaker placement

    Am J Med

    (1978)
  • AK Patel et al.

    Adverse effects of right ventricular pacing in a patient with aortic stenosis

    Chest

    (1977)
  • C Alicandri et al.

    Three cases of hypotension and syncope with ventricular pacing: Possible role of atrial reflexes

    Am J Cardiol

    (1978)
  • E Braunwald

    Symposium on cardiac arrhythmias. Introduction with ws on the hemodynamic significance of atrial systole

    Am J Med

    (1964)
  • RD Snell et al.

    The relationship between the timing of atrial systole and the useful work of the left ventricle in man

    Am Heart J

    (1966)
  • BD Kosowsky et al.

    Re-evaluation of the atrial contribution to ventricular function

    Am J Cardiol

    (1968)
  • P Samet et al.

    Significance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling

    Am J Cardiol

    (1965)
  • A Valero

    Atrial transport dysfunction in acute myocardial dysfunction

    Am J Cardiol

    (1965)
  • A Benchimol et al.

    Hemodynamic consequences of atrial and ventricular pacing in patients with normal and abnormal hearts

    Amer J Med

    (1965)
  • RA Guyton et al.

    The contribution of atrial contraction to right heart function before and after right ventriculotomy

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1976)
  • J Fields et al.

    Surgical experience with temporary and permanent A-V sequential demand pacing

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1973)
  • WJ Mandel et al.

    Critical prolongation of AV conduction time as the inciting mechanism in reentrant tachycardia

    J Electrocardiol

    (1972)
  • A Benchimol et al.

    Cardiac hemodynamics during stimulation of the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle in normal and abnormal hearts

    Circulation

    (1966)
  • P Even et al.

    Etude hemodynamique de la contraction auriculaire chez l'homme: Comparaison des stimulations synchrone et asynchrone au cours de bloc auriculoventriculaire

    Rev Fr Etud Clin Biol

    (1967)
  • DP Zipes et al.

    Artificial atrial and ventricular pacing in the treatment of arrhythmias

    Ann Intern Med

    (1969)
  • R Rokseth et al.

    Pacemaker therapy in sino-atrial block complicated by paroxysmal tachycardia

    Br Heart J

    (1970)
  • DA Chamberlain et al.

    Sequential atrioventricular pacing in heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction

    N Engl J Med

    (1970)
  • LS Dreifus et al.

    Use of atrial and bifocal cardiac pacemakers for treating resistant dysrhythmias

    Eur J Cardiol

    (1975)
  • BV Berkovtis

    Round table: An ideal pacemaker

  • R Sutton et al.

    Electrophysiological and hemodynamic basis for application of new pacemaker technology in sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block

    Br Heart J

    (1979)
  • EE Laslett

    Syncopal attacks associated with prolonged arrest of the whole heart

    Q J Med

    (1909)
  • DS Short

    The syndrome of alternating bradycardia and tachycardia

    Br Heart J

    (1954)
  • IM Ferrer

    The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease

    JAMA

    (1968)
  • W Mandel et al.

    Evaluation of sinoatrial node function in man by overdrive suppression

    Circulation

    (1971)
  • OS Narula et al.

    Significance of sinus-node recovery time

    Circulation

    (1972)
  • WP Lien et al.

    Electrophysiologic manifestations in so-called “sick sinus syndrome”

    Jpn Circ J

    (1978)
  • MM Scheinman et al.

    Electrophysiologic testing in patients with sinus pauses and/or sinoatrial exit block

    Eur J Cardiol

    (1978)
  • BN Goldreyer

    Sinus node dysfunction: A physiologic consideration of arrhythmias involving the sinus node

  • B Meilhac et al.

    Confrontation de l'enregistrement continue ambulatorie de l'electrocardiogramme des 24 heurs et des explorations endocavitaires dans le diagnostic des troubles du rhythme cardiaque

    Arch Mal Coeur

    (1978)
  • JW Lister et al.

    Obscure syncope and the sick sinus syndrome

    PACE

    (1978)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Neurologic complications of arrhythmia treatment

      2014, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The stroke risk in sick sinus syndrome before cardiac pacemaker insertion is substantial and probably remains so after pacemaker insertion (Fisher et al., 1988). The precise stroke risk after cardiac pacemaker insertion remains uncertain, but strokes have been observed in 4.5–23% of paced sick sinus syndrome patients who are followed for 2–3 years (Stone et al., 1982; Rosenqvist et al., 1986; Fisher et al., 1988). Data from long-term follow-up of paced sick sinus syndrome patients indicates that the incidence of stroke is 3% at 1 year, 5% at 5 years, and 13% at 10 years (Sgarbossa et al., 1993).

    • Sick sinus syndrome

      2002, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text