Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(86)90001-9Get rights and content

Abstract

To determine the spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular (LV and RV) ejection fractions (EFs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), radionuclide ventriculography was performed in 114 consecutive patients, admitted without (Killip class I, 78 patients) or with (Killip class II, 36 patients) clinical signs of pulmonary congestion within 24 hours of onset of symptoms of a transmural AMI. Mean LVEF was significantly lower in patients in Killip class II than in those in class I (0.32 ± 0.11 vs 0.46 ± 0.15, p < 0.001) and in patients with anterior than inferior AMI (0.34 ± 0.11 vs 0.52 ± 0.14, p < 0.001). Of the 36 patients with a severely depressed (0.30 or less) LVEF, 15 (42%) were in Killip class I. Mean RVEF did not differ significantly between Killip class I and II patients (0.42 ± 0.11 vs 0.40 ± 0.12, difference not significant) but was significantly lower in patients with inferior than anterior AMI (0.38 ± 0.09 vs 0.44 ± 0.11, p = 0.005). In patients with inferior AMI, a depressed RVEF (0.38 or less) was associated with a normal LVEF in 30% and a depressed LVEF in 20%, whereas in those with anterior AMI, a depressed RVEF, observed in 25% of patients, occurred only in association with a depressed LVEF. At 1 year of follow-up, the 21 nonsurvivors differed significantly from the 93 survivors with respect to LVEF (0.35 ± 0.11 vs 0.45 ± 0.14, p < 0.001), RVEF (0.35 ± 0.11 vs 0.43 ± 0.10, p = 0.006), proportion in Killip class II (57 vs 28%, p = 0.02) and age (69 ± 13 vs 61 ± 11 years, p = 0.01). Mortality rate was 47% in patients with an LVEF of 0.30 or less (group I) compared with 5% in patients with an LVEF greater than 0.30 (group II, p < 0.001). In group I patients, the mortality rate was 75% when RVEF was 0.38 or less, compared with 25% when RVEF was more than 0.38 (p < 0.001). An RVEF of less or greater than 0.38 did not influence mortality in group II patients. Multivariate analysis identified LVEF of 0.30 or less, RVEF 0.38 or less and age as significant independent predictors of mortality. These results show the wide variability in global ventricular function among a subset of patients with AMI with clinical evidence of no or only mild LV failure. They also show independent and additional adverse prognostic implications of a depressed RVEF among a subset of patients with severely depressed LVEF (0.30 or less).

References (29)

Cited by (114)

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Cardiac Transplantation

    2018, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease
  • Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance is a Strong Predictor of Cardiovascular Death after Coronary Bypass Grafting

    2016, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    RV dysfunction status may thus represent a “common final pathway” in the progression of congestive HF and therefore may be a sensitive indicator of poor prognosis. Several recent studies have demonstrated the predictive value of RV function in different HF populations, using different techniques such as echocardiography [21, 22], radionuclide ventriculography [23, 24], right heart catheterization [25], or CMR [8]. Poor RV function was an independent predictor of death and development of HF.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported in part by SCOR for Ischemic Heart Disease Grant HL-17651 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

1

Dr. Staniloff is recipient of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Career Development Award HL-964, Bethesda, Maryland.

View full text