Rate-corrected QT interval: Techniques and limitations

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(93)90035-BGet rights and content

Abstract

The duration of the QT interval on the surface electrocardiogram represents the time required for all ventricular depolarization and repolarization processes to occur. Among the many physiologic and pathologic factors that contribute to the QT interval, heart rate plays a major role. Several approaches have been used to correct the QT interval, all of which take into account the heart rate at which the interval is measured. The simplest and most common approach to correcting the QT interval is to divide its value by the square root of the preceding RR interval expressed in seconds, i.e., by using Bazett's formula. This calculation provides a corrected QT (QTc) interval that represents the QT interval normalized for a heart rate of 60 beats/min. However, several studies have shown that Bazett's correction formula is not optimal. Fridericia's cube-root formula has been shown to perform better in correcting the QT interval for heart rate. Other formulas require the measurement of several QT-RR pairs at various heart rates to obtain a reliable QTc interval and are therefore not easily usable. Any correction formula is likely to introduce an error in assessing the QTc interval. Although the importance of this error should not be minimized, the corrected QT interval remains useful in assessing the effects of drugs on the duration of repolarization. For this purpose, Fridericia's cube-root formula is preferable to Bazett's square-root formula. However, correcting the QT interval for heart rate may conceal important information, such as the kinetics of QT-interval adaptation to a change in heart rate. The most reliable method for assessing the QT interval during drug administration is to avoid QT correction and to measure QT intervals at fixed heart rates.

References (42)

  • PE Puddu et al.

    Evaluation of 10 QT prediction formulas in 881 middle-aged men from the Seven Countries Study: emphasis on the cubic root Fridericia's equation

    J Electrocardiol

    (1988)
  • A Sagie et al.

    An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)

    Am J Cardiol

    (1992)
  • JSM Sarma et al.

    An exponential formula for heart rate dependence of QT interval during exercise and cardiac pacing in humans: reevaluation of Bazett's formula

    Am J Cardiol

    (1984)
  • FA Ehlert et al.

    Relation between QT and RR intervals during exercise testing in atrial fibrillation

    Am J Cardiol

    (1992)
  • C Funck-Brentano et al.

    Effects of bepridil and diltiazem on ventricular repolarization in angina pectoris

    Am J Cardiol

    (1990)
  • MA Habbab et al.

    Drug-induced torsade de pointes: role of early afterdepolarizations and dispersion of repolarization

    Am J Med

    (1990)
  • A Algra et al.

    QTc prolongation measured by standard 12-lead electrocardiography is an independent risk factor for sudden death due to cardiac arrest

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • EG Schouten et al.

    QT interval prolongation predicts cardiovascular mortality in an apparently healthy population

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • S Ahnve

    Is QT interval prolongation a strong or weak predictor for cardiac death?

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • TJ Colatsky et al.

    K+ channel blockers and activators in cardiac arrhythmias

    Cardiovasc Drug Rev

    (1989)
  • C Funck-Brentano

    La repolarisation ventriculaire

    Arch Mal Coeur

    (1992)
  • Cited by (361)

    • Using the Appropriate Formula for QT Measurement Can Save Lives

      2022, Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text