Relation between clinical presentation and angiographic findings in unstable angina pectoris, and comparison with that in stable angina

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(93)90349-HGet rights and content

Abstract

The diagnosis of unstable angina encompasses a broad spectrum of patients with myocardial ischemia, varying widely in cause, prognosis and responsiveness to therapy. A new clinical classification of unstable angina is based on the following 2 components: severity, and the clinical setting in which unstable angina develops. The hypothesis that this clinical classification correlates with the underlying coronary artery anatomy was tested. In 238 consecutive patients, an unstable angina score ranging from 2 to 6 was determined by adding the scores for severity (1 = unstable angina without pain at rest; 2 = pain at rest >48 hours before angiography; and 3 = pain at rest ≤48 hours before angiographic evaluation) and the clinical setting of unstable angina (1 = unstable angina secondary to a noncardiac condition; 2 = primary unstable angina; and 3 = early postinfarction unstable angina). Fifty concurrently studied consecutive patients with stable angina were assigned a score of 0. Patients with unstable angina averaged 63 ± 11 years of age, and 165 were men (69%). Pain at rest occurred in 202 of 238 patients (85%), and angiography was performed ≤48 hours in 139 of these patients (69%). Among patients with unstable angina, 5 (2%) had secondary unstable angina, 143 (60%) had primary unstable angina, and 90 (38%) had postinfarction unstable angina. Multivariable regression analysis identified the unstable angina score as the most important predictor of intracoronary thrombus (p = 0.011) and lesion complexity (p = 0.004) in the ischemia-related artery. The new clinical classification of unstable angina correlates with the underlying angiographic anatomy, and may thus aid in decisions regarding diagnostic procedures and provide a useful basis for comparing the response to therapy among patients with unstable angina.

References (28)

  • CT Sherman et al.

    Coronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina pectoris

    N Engl J Med

    (1986)
  • K Mizuno et al.

    Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary syndromes

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • HK Gold et al.

    A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in patients with unstable angina pectoris

    Circulation

    (1987)
  • P Theroux et al.

    Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina

    N Engl J Med

    (1988)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Clinical classification and plaque morphology determined by optical coherence tomography in unstable angina pectoris

      2010, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Braunwald classification has been widely used because of its effectiveness in evaluating severity and prognosis of UAP. Severity and clinical setting of UAP have been related to lesion complexity.16–18 Moreover, Braunwald19 proposed different causal processes: (1) a nonocclusive thrombus on preexisting plaque, (2) dynamic obstruction (coronary spasm), (3) progressive mechanical obstruction, and (4) inflammation and/or infection.

    • Direct thrombin inhibitors

      2004, Clinical Trials in Heart Disease: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text