Original article: Cardiovascular
Prospective study of quality of life before and after open heart operations

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00936-1Get rights and content

Background.

The aim of this prospective study, with completion of questionnaires before and 3 months after open heart operations, was to evaluate the improvement of quality of life brought about by these operations and the predictors of this improvement.

Methods.

The Nottingham health profile questionnaire contains 38 subjective statements dividend into six sections: energy, physical mobility, emotional reaction, pain, sleep, and social isolation. Factors influencing quality of life scores were determined by analysis of covariance. Factors influencing the status of the patients (improved or worsened) were determined by logistic regression.

Results.

From January to July 1994, 215 consecutive patients underwent elective open heart operations. The comparison between mean preoperative and postoperative scores showed an improvement in all sections of quality of life. An average of 80% of patients were improved by their operations. Independent predictors of less improvement of quality of life scores were as follows: for the energy section, age over 70 and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV; for sleep, age over 70; for physical mobility, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV; for social isolation, female gender; and for pain, age over 70 and abnormal segmental wall motion. Independent predictors of patients worsened by operation were as follows: New York Heart Association functional class III or IV in the energy section (odds ratio = 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 9.8) and in the physical mobility section (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 5.5), female gender in the social isolation section (odds ratio = 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 7.7), and presence of at least one comorbid disease in the emotional reaction section (odds ratio = 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 5.2).

Conclusions.

Cardiac operations improve quality of life in patients. The improvement is similar for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting versus valve replacement, and for patients with no postoperative events versus those with nonlethal postoperative complications. The strongest predictive factors for quality of life are age and New York Heart Association functional class.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (92)

  • Relationship between quality of life and aerobic capacity of patients entering phase II cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

    2012, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
    Citation Excerpt :

    The goal of coronary bypass surgery is to eliminate or reduce symptoms associated with CAD, such as angina and breathlessness, improve the patients' quality of life (QOL), and reduce the risk of further myocardial infarctions.3 Coronary bypass surgery can reduce mortality and the symptoms of chest pain as well as enhance exercise tolerance and daily life activities.4 The clinical assessment of outcomes after CABG is based on the objective evaluation of the patient's cardiovascular status and physical performance.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text