Original study
Effect of diltiazem on coronary flow reserve in patients with microvascular angina

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5273(95)02458-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Microvascular angina is characterized by ischemia-like symptoms in patients with normal coronary arteries and reduced coronary flow reserve. Clinical observations suggested an improvement in clinical symptomatology and exercise tolerance after treatment with calcium antagonists. The effect of diltiazem on coronary flow reserve was evaluated in controls and in patients with microvascular angina. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 16 normotensive patients (7 females, 9 males, mean age 51 ± 10 years) with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Coronary blood flow was determined at rest, after dipyridamole (0.5 mg/kg) and following intravenous administration of diltiazem (10 mg) using coronary sinus thermodilution technique. Coronary flow reserve was calculated as coronary blood flow after dipyridamole divided by coronary blood flow at rest. Patients with normal coronary flow reserve (coronary flow reserve >2.0) received either dipyridamole alone (group 1, controls, n = 6) or dipyridamole and diltiazem (group 2, n = 5), whereas patients with reduced coronary flow reserve (coronary flow reserve <2.0) obtained dipyridamole and diltiazem (group 3, n = 5). Resting coronary flow was identical in the three groups, but after maximal vasodilation with dipyridamole, coronary flow increased significantly more in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3 (P < 0.05, analysis of variance (ANOVA)). Coronary flow reserve was 2.5 in group 1 and 2.3 in group 2, but was significantly reduced in group 3 (1.3; P < 0.05, ANOVA). Intravenous diltiazem failed to increase coronary blood flow in groups 2 and 3. Therefore, diltiazem does not improve reduced coronary flow reserve in patients with microvascular angina, but leaves coronary flow reserve unaffected. The failure to ameliorate impaired coronary flow reserve with diltiazem is in contrast to the reported clinical improvement after calcium channel blockade in these patients. Thus, other factors such as structural abnormalities in the microcirculation or functional abnormality in smooth muscle relaxation not responsive to calcium channel blockade are probably responsible for the occurrence of myocardial ischemia in patients with microvascular angina.

References (37)

  • C Vigorito et al.

    Regional coronary hemodynamic effect of diltiazem in man

    Am Heart J

    (1988)
  • G Sütsch et al.

    Cutaneous and coronary flow reserve in patients with microvascular angina

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1992)
  • MC Vrolix et al.

    Coronary hemodynamics and coronary flow reserve after intracoronary diltiazem in humans

    Am J Cardiol

    (1991)
  • A Maseri et al.

    Mechanism of angina pectoris in syndrome X

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1991)
  • E Marchant et al.

    Acute effect of systemic versus intracoronary dipyridamole on coronary circulation

    Am J Cardiol

    (1986)
  • E Picano et al.

    Transient myocardial dysfunction during pharmacological vasodilation as an index of reduced coronary reserve: a coronary hemodynamic and echocardiographic study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1986)
  • D Opherk et al.

    Reduced coronary dilatory capacity and ultrastructural changes of the myocardium in patients with angina pectoris but normal coronary angiograms

    Circulation

    (1981)
  • PG Camici et al.

    Coronary reserve and exercise ECG in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms

    Circulation

    (1992)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Coronary microvascular dysfunction

      2024, Microvascular Research
    • Targeted Therapies for Microvascular Disease

      2023, Interventional Cardiology Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Calcium channel blockers act to cause coronary vasodilation and are particularly effective in coronary vasospasm.25 Limited trial benefit exists in CMD and diltiazem has been shown to not improve CFR in MVA.9,49 Verapamil and Nifedipine use have been shown to improve angina symptoms in patients with angina and normal angiographic coronary arteries but this did not remove patients with vasospastic angina.50

    • EDIT-CMD: Are We Comparing Apples With Oranges?

      2022, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text