Primary stent implantation compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Jeremy Weedon, PhD, for helpful statistical advice, and David Antoniucci, MD, Cindy L. Grines, MD, Akiyoshi Kawashima, MD, Alfredo Rodriguez, MD, PhD, Shigeru Saito, MD, Bruno Scheller, MD, and Gregg W. Stone, MD, for contributing and/or verifying data.
References (20)
- et al.
A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarctionresults from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1998) - et al.
In-hospital and late results of coronary stents versus conventional balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (GRAMI trial) (Gianturco-Roubin in Acute Myocardial Infarction)
Am J Cardiol
(1998) - et al.
A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2000) - et al.
Cost-effective analysis of primary infarct-artery stenting versus optimal primary angioplasty (the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions [FRESCO] trial)
Am J Cardiol
(2000) - et al.
Update on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
- et al.
Ticlopidine and subcutaneous heparin as an alternative regimen following coronary stenting
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn
(1994) - et al.
Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance
Circulation
(1995) - et al.
Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction
Circulation
(1998) - et al.
Primary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarctionfinal results of the primary angioplasty versus stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction (PASTA) trial. PASTA Trial Investigators
Cathet Cardiovasc Interven
(1999) - et al.
Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group
N Engl J Med
(1999)
Cited by (156)
Percutaneous coronary artery interventions in the paediatric population: Periprocedural and late outcome
2018, Archives of Cardiovascular DiseasesPostmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock
2018, Cardiac Intensive CareCardiac stem cells for myocardial regeneration: promising but not ready for prime time
2017, Current Opinion in BiotechnologyAcute myocardial infarction
2017, The LancetCitation Excerpt :For patients just outside of the 90-min time window, results of the PRAGUE-2 and DANAMI-2 trials suggest that transfer to a PCI-capable hospital is safe and decreases mortality compared with fibrinolysis,19–21 and is advised if it can be completed in 120 min or less (appendix p 3).4,15 Stent placement decreases target vessel revascularisation and subsequent myocardial infarction compared with balloon angioplasty alone.22,23 Several studies and meta-analyses show that drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce target vessel revascularisation compared with bare-metal stents (BMS),24–26 and some studies suggest that DES might also reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in some patients.27–29
A meta-analytic overview of thrombectomy during primary angioplasty
2013, International Journal of CardiologyST-segment elevation myocardial infarction heart of Charlotte one-year (STEMI HOC-1) study: a prospective study protocol
2023, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders