Coronary Artery Disease
Influence of lesion length on restenosis after coronary stent placement

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00165-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The length of a coronary lesion is a significant predictor of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. The influence of lesion length has not comprehensively been assessed after coronary stent placement. This study includes 2,736 consecutive patients with coronary stent placement. Only patients with recent or chronic occlusions before the intervention were excluded. Patients were divided in 2 groups: 573 patients with long lesions (≥15 mm) and 2,163 patients with short lesions (<15 mm). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the procedural success rate and incidence of subacute thrombosis. One-year event-free survival was lower in patients with long lesions (73.3% vs 80.0%, p = 0.001). Six-month angiography was performed in 82.5% of the eligible patients. The incidence of binary restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis) was higher in patients with long lesions (36.9% vs 27.9%, p <0.001). Similarly, patients with long lesions presented more late lumen loss than those with short lesions (1.29 ± 0.89 vs 1.07 ± 0.77 mm, p <0.001). Multivariate models for both binary restenosis and late lumen loss demonstrated that lesion length was an independent risk factor for restenosis. The risk was further increased by multiple stent placement and overlapping stents that were also independent risk factors of restenosis. Stented segment length did not show any independent effect. Therefore, long lesions represent an independent risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent placement. The results of this study suggest that a possible way to reduce the risk is to cover the lesion with a minimal number of nonoverlapping stents.

Section snippets

Patients

This study includes a consecutive series of patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease who underwent coronary stent placement from January 1994 to October 1997. Exclusion criteria were only recent and chronic occlusions that precluded the assessment of lesion length.

Stent placement and poststenting treatment

The stent placement and poststenting therapy has been described previously.15, 16 Various stent types were implanted, including Palmaz-Schatz (Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems Co., Warren, New Jersey), Inflow (Inflow

Clinical outcome

The study population comprised 2,736 patients. Using the cut-off value of 15 mm, 573 patients (21%) had long lesions and 2,163 patients had short lesions. The proportion of patients with long lesions remained relatively stable over the years of the study period: 17% in the first, 23% in the second, and 21% both in the third and fourth year (p = 0.20). Main baseline characteristics of the patients are listed in Table Iand compared between patients with long lesions and patients with short

Discussion

The main finding of this study is that long lesions are associated with a less favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcome than shorter lesions, but without a significant influence on procedural success rate and incidence of subacute thrombosis. Greater lesion length exercises an independent negative effect that is further potentiated by placing multiple and overlapping stents.

References (26)

  • P.W Serruys et al.

    A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • D.L Fischman et al.

    A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • I Moussa et al.

    Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients undergoing multivessel coronary stenting

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • Cited by (201)

    • Outcomes of the Novel Supreme Drug-Eluting Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions: A PIONEER III Substudy

      2022, Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
    • Orbital Atherectomy for the Treatment of Long (≥25–40 mm) Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: ORBIT II Sub-Analysis

      2020, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this study, we sought to perform a subgroup analysis of the ORBIT II trial with specific focus on longer (≥25–40 mm) lesions, as there is currently limited published data regarding use of OA in this subgroup. PCI of longer target lesions is known to be associated with worse clinical outcomes, likely due to extensive manipulation and injury to the arterial luminal wall causing exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia [8–10]. Operators may thus be understandably cautious in approaching these longer lesions with OA due to the potential for longer treatment time and the possible increase in embolic material.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text