Electrophysiologic profile and efficacy of intravenous dofetilide (UK-68,798), a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80293-8Get rights and content

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that class III antiarrhythmic agents may be superior to class I agents for the long-term treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This open study evaluated the acute electrophysiologic effects, antiarmythmic efficacy, and safety of different doses of intravenous dofetilide, a new class III drug, in 50 patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed electrical stimulation who had previously been unsuccessfully treated with 0 to 7 (median 3) other drugs. Intravenous dofetilide was administered over 60 minutes at the following dose levels: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, and 15.0 μg/kg. Significant class III activity was apparent at doses of 3.0 to 15.0 μg/kg, as evidenced by dose-related prolongation of the QTc interval by 13.4% to 14.2%, ventricular effective refractory period by 7.9% to 20.6%, and ventricular functional refractory period by 7.3% to 25.0%. The corresponding mean ± SD plasma dofetilide concentrations ranged from 1.45 ± 0.52 to 6.48 ± 1.31 ng/ml. There was no evidence of reverse use-dependence. At these electrophysiologically active dose levels, intravenous dofetilide suppressed (complete response) or slowed (partial response) inducible ventricular tachycardia in 17 of 41 patients (41%) compared with 0 of 9 patients receiving only 1.5 μg/kg. The response rate was fairly uniform among the groups receiving 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, and 15.0 μg/kg. Intravenous dofetilide was hemodynamically well tolerated. Torsades de pointes (which was self-limiting) developed in only 1 patient, who was allocated to receive 15.0 μg/kg. There were no other proarrhythmic episodes or serious adverse effects. Further evaluation of the therapeutic potential of dofetilide in the management of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias is justified.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

  • Pause-dependent polymorphic ventricular tachycardia during long-term treatment with dofetilide: A placebo-controlled, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-based evaluation

    2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The latter finding suggests that dofetilide may reduce the number of recurrences of this type of VT. This is consistent with previous experimental (30,31)and clinical (18,19)studies, which showed that dofetilide reduced the inducibility rate of sustained MVT. Such an effect on MVT is consistent with an increase in wavelength of the reentry circuit due to lengthening of tissue refractoriness (32).

  • Dofetilide: Is the treatment worse than the disease?

    2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, dofetilide treatment was associated with a significantly increased rate of successful antitachycardia pacing in ICD patients. These data are consistent with two small studies showing dofetilide was also effective in acutely suppressing inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia during serial electrophysiologic testing in approximately 45% of patients (25,26). Under the protective cover of an ICD device, electrophysiologists and cardiologists may be more accepting of potential rare episodes of ventricular proarrhythmia, as long as the antiarrhythmic effects of the dofetilide prove beneficial.

  • Role of dofetilide in patients with ventricular arrhythmias

    2024, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported in part by a grant from Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom.

View full text