Clinical study
Is geography destiny for patients in new york with myocardial infarction?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00446-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The use of coronary revascularization among patients with myocardial infarction varies by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The objective of this study was to determine whether local availability of facilities might influence apparent racial disparities in revascularization and health outcomes.

Methods

Using Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data (1988–1999) from the New York State Department of Health, we determined revascularization rates among patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction in two socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in New York City (the South Bronx, which has no hospitals that have revascularization facilities, and Harlem, which has three revascularization facilities), as well as in its most advantaged community (mid-Manhattan, which has six such facilities). The rest of New York City served as reference. We measured demographic and clinical characteristics and revascularization rates in each community.

Results

Among patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction, the age-adjusted revascularization rates were 29.2% for whites, 12.5% for blacks, and 19.9% for Hispanics (P <0.01). Rates were 12.0% in the South Bronx, 24.0% in Harlem, 38.4% in mid-Manhattan, and 21.2% in the rest of New York City (P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance status, comorbidity, clinical complications, and year of admission, revealed that South Bronx patients were about 20% less likely to be revascularized than those in the rest of New York City, whereas patients living in Harlem were twice as likely to receive such treatment as residents in the rest of New York City. Among patients admitted to hospitals with cardiac revascularization facilities, lower use among South Bronx residents persisted, but after adjusting for patient characteristics, Harlem residents were significantly less likely to be revascularized than those from the rest of New York City.

Conclusion

Race and socioeconomic factors influence the likelihood of revascularization after myocardial infarction among residents of New York City. In addition, lack of availability of revascularization further reduces its use by residents of disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Section snippets

Data sources

We used the 1988 to 1999 Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database, created by the New York State Department of Health (12). SPARCS contains discharge data abstracted for at least 95% of all New York State hospital admissions, except for psychiatric and federal hospitals. Data include age, sex, race, admission status, physician and hospital identifiers, principal diagnosis and up to 14 secondary diagnoses, principal procedure code and up to 14 other procedure codes,

Results

Residents of the South Bronx and Harlem were more likely to be younger, living under the poverty line, and unemployed than those in either mid-Manhattan or elsewhere in New York City (Table 1). They also had lower per capita incomes and less education (Table 1). Patients from the South Bronx and Harlem were less likely than those from mid-Manhattan and elsewhere in the city to be white, less likely to have private insurance coverage, and more likely to be on Medicaid.

During the 12 years of

Discussion

Among residents of disadvantaged communities in New York City, local availability of coronary reperfusion significantly increased revascularization for myocardial infarction. Revascularization was more common among Harlem residents than those from the South Bronx, presumably because more Harlem residents with myocardial infarction were admitted to hospitals that had revascularization facilities. Treatment of patients admitted to hospitals performing revascularization was similar, regardless of

Acknowledgements

SPARCS data were provided by the New York State Department of Health.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Cardiovascular Health Issues in Inner City Populations

    2015, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    These disparities may be driven by financial disincentives for caring for patients of low socioeconomic status with a higher prevalence of smoking and comorbid conditions (adversely impacting surgical candidacy), as well as system capacity issues in the inner city and patient-level choices influenced by level of education, understanding of risks and benefits of complex treatments, and the ability to take time from work to recover from invasive procedures.76 In 1 of the few large-scale studies to evaluate access to acute cardiovascular care in a distinct inner city population, Fang and Alderman found that residents of South Bronx, a socioeconomically deprived neighbourhood in New York City, had lower rates of coronary revascularization after MI (compared with the rest of New York City), even after controlling for demographic characteristics, insurance status, and clinical status (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88).75 This finding resulted from the reduced availability of revascularization facilities at inner city hospitals in New York City, as well as a reduced likelihood of South Bronx residents to undergo revascularization when admitted to a hospital with appropriate facilities (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88).75

  • Multivariate bayesian spatial model of preterm birth and cardiovascular disease among georgia women: Evidence for life course social determinants of health

    2013, Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Geographically, CVD mortality rates are highest in the Ohio and Mississippi river valleys, and lowest in the Southwest and Plains states (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a,b). Small-area and regional variations in CVD disease incidence and mortality have been attributed to neighborhood poverty and deprivation (Chaix, 2009; Christensen et al., 2008; Pedigo et al., 2011), pollution and climate (Franz and Bailey, 2004; Hu and Rao, 2009), health behaviors (Glasser et al., 2008; Popham, 2011), and medical care practices (Fang and Alderman, 2003; Welch et al., 2011). While these factors explain a portion of the geographic variation, residual spatial variation after controlling for these measured characteristics suggests unmeasured place-based effects persist (Howard et al., 2009).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported by a Health Service Research grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS11612–01A1).

View full text