Original Articles
Accurate Localization of Mitral Regurgitant Defects Using Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00084-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Appropriate patient selection for surgical repair of the mitral valve depends on the specific location and mechanism of regurgitation, which, in turn, has necessitated a more detailed method to accurately describe mitral pathology. This study tests a strategy of using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography to systematically localize mitral regurgitant defects and compares these results with the surgical findings.

Methods. Fifty patients with mitral regurgitation underwent intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation of mitral pathology and potential repair. Mitral regurgitant defects were localized using a systematic strategy and a simple nomenclature that divides each mitral valve into six sections (three sections per leaflet) and each prosthetic sewing ring into six sections (60 radial degrees = one section).

Results. Thirty-nine patients with native mitral valves were studied, for a total of 234 sections evaluated. Eighty-seven of these sections contained regurgitant defects by transesophageal echocardiography (mean number of regurgitant defects per valve, 2.2; range, 1 through 6). There was agreement between the transesophageal echocardiographic and surgical localizations in 96% (224/234; p < 0.0001) of the sections. Eleven patients with prosthetic mitral valves were studied, for a total of 66 sections evaluated. Twenty-three of these sections contained paravalvular leaks by transesophageal echocardiography (mean number of leaks per prosthesis, 2.1; range, 1 through 6). There was agreement between the transesophageal echocardiographic and surgical localizations in 88% (58/66; p < 0.001) of the sections.

Conclusions. This transesophageal echocardiographic strategy provides a systematic method to accurately localize mitral regurgitant lesions and has the potential to improve the preoperative assessment of patients with significant mitral regurgitation.

Section snippets

Patient Selection

All patients with significant mitral regurgitation undergoing intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in conjunction with valve repair or replacement from 1993 through 1996 at Massachusetts General Hospital were evaluated for inclusion in the study. The patients had either native or prosthetic mitral valve disease. Patients were excluded from the study if any of the following variables was present: they had major concomitant mitral stenosis, the transesophageal examination was performed

Native Mitral Regurgitant Defects

A total of 39 patients with native mitral valves were studied to localize mitral pathology and regurgitant defects. As each mitral valve had six sections, a total of 234 mitral sections were evaluated. Of these 234 sections, 82 were found by transesophageal echocardiography to have regurgitant defects. In all 39 patients, mitral regurgitation was the result of prolapsing or flail leaflet segments. A mean of 2.2 regurgitant defects per valve (range, 1 through 6) were identified. The majority of

Comment

This study demonstrates the use of a strategy to localize mitral regurgitant defects using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. This approach is shown to be accurate for both native and prosthetic mitral regurgitant defects when compared with the surgical findings.

An improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of mitral regurgitation has led to advances in surgical therapies 12, 13. Specifically, in selected patients, surgical repair has become the treatment of choice [14].

References (23)

Cited by (150)

  • Adult Intraoperative Echocardiography: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practice

    2020, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Practice Pattern Variation in the Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography for Open Valve Cardiac Surgery

    2019, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Claims for TEE at the time of surgery were more common in the MV (or combined MV-AV) subgroup where only 1 in 7 patients lacked an intraoperative TEE claim. This observation may be due to the unique role TEE has in surgical planning in MV procedures, particularly MV repair.5,6,10,22-24, 45-47 Nonetheless, even in this context, claims for intraoperative TEE were well below 100%.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text