Elsevier

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volume 66, Issue 3, September 1998, Pages 1055-1059
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Supplements
Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know?

Presented at “Facts and Myths of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Current Trends in Thoracic Surgery IV,” New Orleans, LA, Jan 24, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00815-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. With increasing use of beating heart techniques for bypass of the left anterior descending coronary artery with the left internal mammary artery (LIMA), appropriate concerns have been raised of whether graft patency by these techniques compares favorably with conventional, arrested heart techniques.

Methods. All published articles that examine outcome efficacy of the LIMA graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery were reviewed. Because angiography has been considered the “gold standard,” only those studies that included angiographic follow-up were analyzed.

Results. From 1972 through 1998, there have been 37 peer-reviewed publications that examined outcomes of LIMA grafting in conventional coronary bypass grafting, of which 27 contained angiographic follow-up data. The completeness of angiographic follow-up was variable, but early graft patency (≤1 month) in studied patients ranged between 94% and 99%. Late graft patency (up to 15 years) ranged from 51% to 98%. Five recent series of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting that contained LIMA graft patency data show early graft patency rates between 91% and 99%.

Conclusions. Meaningful comparison of LIMA graft patency between arrested heart, conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting is difficult; however, early graft patency by both techniques can confidently be stated as being 90% or greater.

Section snippets

Material and methods

A literature review was undertaken to determine the published results regarding the efficacy of the use of the LIMA for revascularization of the LAD. All articles from the first published article by Green in 1972 to the most recently published series of MIDCABG in 1998 were analyzed 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40. Determination of the end points used to demonstrate benefit was made for

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting

From 1972 through 1998, there have been a total of 37 peer-reviewed publications that address the efficacy of the LIMA for revascularization of the LAD. These include two editorials, which themselves contain no results 4, 5. The remaining 35 publications present the results of LIMA grafting from 18 institutions. Institutions with multiple publications include St. Luke’s-Roosevelt (6), Cleveland Clinic (5), St. Louis University (4), and Ottawa (3), with two publications each from the groups in

Comment

Although an extensive body of literature exists addressing the issue of LIMA graft patency, the ability to answer the question of whether MIDCABG graft patency is comparable with that of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting is difficult to assess because the series are not comparable. Table 1 and Table 5, which illustrate early graft patency results, are most comparable. However, the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting series can be variously criticized for not including

References (42)

Cited by (101)

  • Enabling Technology for Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

    2009, Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text