Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2003, Pages 103-112
Journal of Biomechanics

A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid–structure interaction in the aortic valve

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00244-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Numerical analysis of the aortic valve has mainly been focused on the closing behaviour during the diastolic phase rather than the kinematic opening and closing behaviour during the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle. Moreover, the fluid–structure interaction in the aortic valve system is most frequently ignored in numerical modelling. The effect of this interaction on the valve's behaviour during systolic functioning is investigated. The large differences in material properties of fluid and structure and the finite motion of the leaflets complicate blood–valve interaction modelling. This has impeded numerical analyses of valves operating under physiological conditions. A numerical method, known as the Lagrange multiplier based fictitious domain method, is used to describe the large leaflet motion within the computational fluid domain. This method is applied to a three-dimensional finite element model of a stented aortic valve. The model provides both the mechanical behaviour of the valve and the blood flow through it. Results show that during systole the leaflets of the stented valve appear to be moving with the fluid in an essentially kinematical process governed by the fluid motion.

Introduction

Many numerical structural models have been developed that describe the behaviour of the aortic valve ignoring its interaction with the blood, e.g. see Black et al. (1991); Chandran et al. (1991); Krucinski et al. (1993); De Hart et al. (1998); Cacciola et al. (2000). The valve opening and closing during systole involves, however, a strong interaction between blood and the surrounding tissue. Several attempts have been made to analyse the valve behaviour using numerical fluid–structure interaction models, e.g. see Horsten (1990); Peskin and McQueen (1995); Makhijani et al. (1997). A detailed three-dimensional analysis of the valve kinematics, mechanics and fluid dynamics during the systolic phase has not been reported to date.

Modelling of such a fluid–structure interaction system is complicated due to the large motion of the thin leaflets through the computational fluid domain. The mathematical formulation of the equation of motion for a fluid is most conveniently described with respect to an Eulerian reference frame. However, this is incompatible with the Lagrangian formulation which is more appropriate to describe a structural phase. The arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method, first proposed by Donea et al. (1982), effectively combines the two different formulations and is frequently used in fluid–structure interaction analyses. Applied to the fluid phase, the ALE method requires a continuous adaptation of the fluid mesh without modification of the topology. Due to the large leaflet motions it is, however, difficult to adapt the fluid mesh in such a way that a proper mesh quality is maintained without changing the topology. Alternatively, remeshing of the fluid domain may be performed in conjunction with an ALE method, where remeshing is only performed if the mesh has degenerated too much. The change in topology during remeshing requires the use of interpolation techniques to recover state variables on the newly generated mesh. This not only introduces artificial diffusivity, but is also difficult and/or time-consuming to perform with sufficient robustness and accuracy for three-dimensional problems.

To resolve the limitations of these mesh update strategies we use a fictitious domain method to describe the interaction of the leaflets with the fluid. In this method, the different mathematical descriptions for the fluid and structure can be maintained, allowing convenient classical formulations for each of these subsystems. Moreover, the fluid mesh is not altered or interrupted by the presence of the immersed domain, and therefore preserves its original quality. Experimental validation of this method applied to a two-dimensional aortic valve model is demonstrated by De Hart et al. (2000). The application to a three-dimensional isotropic valve with rigid aortic root (mimicking a stented valve) and trileaflet symmetry is described in this paper. The model is used to study the effect of fluid–structure interaction on the valve behaviour for a reduced Reynolds number flow. We intend to address the importance of systolic functioning on the valve's (life-long) functionality. To this end, the influence of the fluid-structure interaction on the valve kinematics is investigated and the impact on the structural stress state and the associated fluid dynamical flow is analysed.

Section snippets

Methods

The blood flow is considered to be isothermal and incompressible. Assuming a Newtonian constitutive behaviour (Caro et al., 1978), the flow within the domain Ωf bounded by Γf can be described by the well-known Navier–Stokes equation and continuity equation:ρfvft+vf·vf=−pf+·2ηfDfinΩf,·vf=0inΩf,where ρf denotes the density, t the time, vf is the velocity, the gradient operator with respect to the current configuration, pf the pressure, ηf the dynamic viscosity of the fluid and Df

Model properties

The aortic valve consists of three highly flexible leaflets, which are attached to the aortic root from one commissural point along a doubly curved line (aortic ring) towards a second commissural point, as illustrated in Fig. 3(a)–(c). Behind each leaflet the aortic root bulbs into a sinus cavity to form the beginning of the ascending aorta. Fig. 4 shows the relevant dimensions, which have frequently been used to describe the geometry of the valve. The values of these dimensions, based on the

Results

The valve kinematics is controlled by the surrounding fluid flow and the interaction of this flow with the leaflets, resulting in substantially different opening and closing configurations (Fig. 7). The opening behaviour is typical for stented valves (Cacciola, 1998) showing high curvatures of the free edge (Fig. 7(b)). The Reynolds number, defined as Re=ρfVr/ηf, reaches a value of 900 at peak systolic mainstream velocity, i.e. V=300 (mm/s) at t=0.065 (s). However, the moment of complete opening

Discussion

A three-dimensional fictitious domain method is applied to model fluid–structure interaction in the aortic valve. The method is based on the imposition of kinematical constraints, using Lagrange multipliers, which represent the no-slip conditions along the fluid–structure interface. The implementation of this numerical technique is performed within the framework of the finite element method encoded in the SEPRAN software package (Segal, 2000). The essential feature of this approach is that

References (25)

  • F. Brezzi

    On the existence, uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from Lagrange multipliers

    RAIRO—Operations Research

    (1974)
  • Cacciola, G., 1998. Design, simulation and manufacturing of fiber reinforced polymer heart valves. Ph.D. Thesis,...
  • Cited by (328)

    • A coupled SPH-PD model for fluid–structure interaction in an irregular channel flow considering the structural failure

      2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Besides this, some grid-based methods, such as the immersed boundary (IB) method [29,30], naturally avoid the interface-tracking difficulty by distributing the nodal forces and interpolating the velocities between Eulerian and Lagrangian domains. Although grid-based methods have been successfully used in many FSI problems [31–36], some of their drawbacks still exist, such as the requirement for mesh updating and a lack of accuracy when dealing with large deformations and fractures in structures. Meshfree methods, on the other hand, overcome such difficulties by using arbitrarily distributed nodes (or particles) and integral interpolation for approximation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text