Elsevier

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Volume 39, Issue 4, January–February 1997, Pages 361-398
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Special Article
Pathophysiology and pharmacological approaches for prevention of coronary artery restenosis following coronary artery balloon angioplasty and related procedures

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-0620(97)80034-5Get rights and content

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become a mainstay in the treatment of ischemic heart disease, with an estimated 300,000 procedures performed annually in the United States. Despite significant advances in reducing the acute complications of percutaneous revascularization procedures with periprocedural medications and better techniques, chronic restenosis of dilated lesions remains a serious and frequent problem, occurring in 30% to 50% of cases. With a peak incidence between 1 and 4 months after PTCA, restenosis has been thought to reflect an exaggerated healing response to balloon injury, in which platelets and other cells secrete mitogens that induce smooth muscle cells from the media to migrate to and proliferate in the intima, compromising the coronary lumen and invoking ischemic symptoms. Several factors, including remodeling with compensatory arterial enlargement, normalization of wall shear stress, and recoil, are also likely to play key roles. Based on these concepts, several pharmacological approaches directed at reducing the incidence of restenosis have been investigated. Although studies frequently report suppression of neointimal proliferation in animal models of balloon vascular injury, few drug approaches have met with clear success in clinical trials. This can be explained in several ways, including mistaken understandings of the pathophysiology of restenosis, gross histopathological dissimilarities between animal vascular injury models and clinical restenosis, and inadequate dosing. This report proposes to extensively review the vast literature on the subject to serve as a guide for clinicians to the pathophysiology of restenosis and the pharmacotherapeutic management of patients after PTCA and coronary atherectomy. Those drug approaches that currently show the most clinical promise and that warrant further investigation will be highlighted.

References (359)

  • NobuyoshiM et al.

    Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Pathologic observations in 20 patients

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1991)
  • GarrattKN et al.

    Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: Differences between primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions and influence of subintimal tissue resection

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1990)
  • EberB et al.

    Increased IgM-anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Am J Cardiol

    (1992)
  • WallerBF et al.

    Status of the major epicardial coronary arteries 80 to 150 days after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: analysis of 3 necropsy patients

    Am J Cardiol

    (1983)
  • WallerBF et al.

    Morphologic evidence of accelerated left main coronary disease: A late complication of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1987)
  • HermansWR et al.

    Therapeutic dissection after successful coronary balloon angioplasty: No influence on restenosis or on clinical outcome in 693 patients. The MERCATOR Study Group (Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to Prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis)

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1992)
  • PetersonMB et al.

    Thromboxane release during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Am Heart J

    (1986)
  • WargovichTJ et al.

    Reduction in myocardial neutrophil accumulation and infarct size following administration of thromboxane inhibitor U-63,557A

    Am Heart J

    (1987)
  • HanasakiK et al.

    Receptor mediated mitogenic effect of thromboxane A2 in vascular smooth muscle cells

    Biochem Pharmacol

    (1990)
  • CiabattoniG et al.

    Aspirin, but not heparin, suppresses the transient increase in thromboxane biosynthesis associated with cardiac catheterization or coronary angioplasty

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1993)
  • BourassaMG et al.

    Prevention of acute complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Thromb Res

    (1990)
  • TaylorRR et al.

    Effects of low-dose aspirin on restenosis after coronary angioplasty

    Am J Cardiol

    (1991)
  • SchwartzL et al.

    The role of antiplatelet agents in modifying the extent of restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Am Heart J

    (1990)
  • LemboNJ et al.

    Effect of pretreatment with aspirin versus aspirin plus dipyridamole on frequency and type of acute complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Am J Cardiol

    (1990)
  • SavageMP et al.

    Multi-Hospital Eastern Atlantic Restenosis Trial II: A placebo controlled trial of thromboxane blockade in the prevention of restenosis following coronary angioplasty

    Am Heart J

    (1991)
  • TimmermansC et al.

    Ridogrel in the setting of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Am J Cardiol

    (1991)
  • GruntzigAR et al.

    Nonoperative dilatation of coronary artery stenosis-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    N Engl J Med

    (1979)
  • BredlauCe et al.

    In hospital morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty

    Circulation

    (1985)
  • DetreK et al.

    Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985–1986, 1977–1981. The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Registry

    N Engl J Med

    (1988)
  • Abrupt closure: The CAVEAT 1 Experience

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1995)
  • LeimgruberPP et al.

    Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single vessel disease

    Circulation

    (1986)
  • HolmesDR et al.

    Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): A report from the PTCA Registry of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute

    Am J Cardiol

    (1984)
  • SerruysPW et al.

    Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: A time related phenomenon

    Circulation

    (1988)
  • RoubinGS et al.

    Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: The Emory University Hospital experience

    Am J Cardiol

    (1987)
  • GruntzigAR et al.

    Long-term follow up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The early Zurich experience

    N Engl J Med

    (1987)
  • MabinTA et al.

    Follow up clinical results in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Circulation

    (1985)
  • GlazierJJ et al.

    Outcome in patients with recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty

    Br Heart J

    (1989)
  • ReederGS et al.

    Is percutaneous coronary angioplasty less expensive than bypass surgery?

    N Engl J Med

    (1984)
  • BerreklouwE et al.

    Bilaterial mammary artery surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease? An analysis of effects and costs

    Eur Heart J

    (1989)
  • KimuraT et al.

    Difference in acute gain (AG) and late loss (LL) relationship among three different new angioplasty devices (NAD)

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • TopolEJ et al.

    A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • HolmesDR et al.

    A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions

    Circulation

    (1995)
  • SerruysPW et al.

    A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • FischmanDL et al.

    A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • FischmanD et al.

    Acute and late angiographic results of the Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS)

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1994)
  • DeutschE et al.

    Acute and chronic outcomes after physiologic low stress angioplasty (PLOSA) of de novo cornary stenoses: Results of the Phase I trial

    Circulation

    (1992)
  • HiganoSt et al.

    Intravascular ultrasound and restenosis: A cost analysis

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • WiedermannJG et al.

    Intracoronary irradiation markedly reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in a porcine model

    Circulation

    (1993)
  • MazurW et al.

    High dose rate intracoronary irradiation suppresses neointimal proliferation in the stented and ballooned model of porcine restenosis

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • WiedermannJG et al.

    Intracoronary irradiation markedly reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in a porcine model: Six month follow up

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Preclinical models of restenosis: Achievements and challenges

      2013, Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos
    • Evaluating surface bound rTFPI through an in vitro model of vessel wall injury

      2011, Thrombosis Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A 4x decrease to 50 sec− 1 resulted in 40-45% more inhibition. In addition to presenting a potentially procoagulant surface, implanted stents, grafts and other devices tend to cause injury to the surrounding vessel wall and expose TF that is normally separated from the circulating blood by an endothelial cell barrier [14–17]. Exposure of this subendothelial TF may ultimately lead to the formation of thrombus and can contribute to device failure.

    • Zotarolimus (ABT-578) eluting stents

      2006, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text