Research in context
Evidence before this study
We searched PubMed from Jan 1, 1980, to Jan 31, 2019, with the search terms “heart failure”, “sex differences”, “gender differences”, “women”, “men”, “outcome”, “mortality”, “hospitalization”, “drugs”, “medication”, “dose”, “angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors”, “angiotensin-receptor blockers”, and “beta-blockers”. There were no studies that directly compared the optimal dose levels of current evidence-based drugs on a continuous scale, in relation to clinical outcome of men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction separately. We did not limit the search to English language publications.
Added value of this study
To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that there are striking sex differences in the optimal dose levels of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers and β blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, in which women had the lowest risk of death or hospitalisation for heart failure at half the guideline-recommended doses compared with men.
Implications of all the available evidence
Because of the under-representation of women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in all previous clinical drug trials, and in the absence of prospective sex-specific dose-finding clinical trials of current therapies, this is the best available evidence with regards to the optimal dose levels of medication for heart failure in men and women separately. These findings should also prompt similar studies in other cardiovascular disease areas.