Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 349, Issue 9060, 26 April 1997, Pages 1202-1209
The Lancet

Articles
Acute myocardial infarction and combined oral contraceptives: results of an international multicentre case-control study*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02358-1Get rights and content

Summary

Background

The association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was established in studies from northern Europe and the USA, which took place during the 1960s and 1970s. Few data are available to quantify the risk worldwide of AMI associated with use of OCs introduced since those early studies. This hospital-based case-control study examined the association between a first AMI and current OC use in women from Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America (21 centres).

Methods

Cases were women aged 20–44 years who had definite or possible AMI (classified by history, electrocardiographic, and cardiac-enzyme criteria), who were admitted to hospital, and who survived for at least 24 h. Up to three hospital controls matched by 5-year ageband were recruited for each of the 368 cases (941 controls). All participants were interviewed while in hospital with the same questionnaire, which included information on medical and personal history, lifetime contraceptive use, and blood-pressure screening before the most recent episode of OC use. Odds ratios compared the risk of AMI in current OC users and in non-users (past users and never-users combined).

Findings

The overall odds ratio for AMI was 5·01 (95% CI 2·54–9·90) in Europe and 4·78 (2·52–9·07) in the non-European (developing) countries; however, these risk estimates reflect the frequent coexistence of other risk factors among OC users who have AMI. Very few AMIs were identified among women who had no cardiovascular risk factors and who reported that their blood pressure had been checked before OC use; odds ratios associated with OC use in such women were not increased in either Europe or the developing countries. Among OC users who smoked ten or more cigarettes per day, the odds ratios in Europe and in the developing countries were over 20. Similarly, among OC users with a history of hypertension (during pregnancy or at any other time), odds ratios were at least ten in both groups of countries. No consistent association between odds ratios for AMI and age of OC users or oestrogen dose was apparent in either group of countries. No significant increase in odds ratios was apparent with increasing duration of OC use among current users, and odds ratios were not significantly increased in women who had stopped using OCs, even after long exposure. The study had insufficient power to examine whether progestagen dose or type had any effect on AMI risk.

Interpretation

Current use of combined OCs is associated with an increased risk of AMI among women with known cardiovascular risk factors and among those who have not been effectively screened, particularly for blood pressure. AMI is extremely rare in younger (<35 years) non-smoking women who use OCs, and the estimated excess risk of AMI in such women in the European centres is about 3 per 106 woman-years. The risk is likely to be even lower if blood pressure is screened before, and presumably during, OC use. Only among older women who smoke is the degree of excess risk associated with OCs substantial (about 400 per 106 woman-years).

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was first linked with the use of oral contraceptives (OCs) in a case report1 shortly after these drugs became available. Thereafter the results of many case-control studies2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 suggested that the association was causal, and three cohort studies18, 19, 20 provided limited but supportive information.

Most previous studies of the cardiovascular side-effects of OCs were undertaken in the 1960s and 1970s, and they provide limited information on risks associated with modern OCs, which have low oestrogen doses. Also, few data are available from outside northern Europe and the USA. In the time since most of the previous studies took place, prescribing recommendations have changed towards the preferential use of OCs by younger women who do not have other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Thus, three case-control studies conducted during the 1990s15, 16, 17 showed only small and nonsignificant increases in risk of AMI associated with OC use in the UK and USA.

The WHO Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception,21 a multicentre, hospital-based, case-control study carried out in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America (including the Caribbean), was designed to examine the association between use of modern OCs and three cardiovascular diseases. The results of the venous thromboembolism and stroke components of the study have been reported previously.22, 23, 24, 25 This paper reports findings on the AMI component of the study, the principal aim of which was to examine the association between a first AMI and current OC use in women from Europe and from the other three regions combined. Subsidiary aims were to investigate whether risk estimates differed among subgroups of women, such as smokers or women with hypertension, or according to type, duration, and past use of OCs, which most previous studies had been too small to address.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Detailed description of study methods has been given elsewhere.21, 22 This hospital-based, case-control study was undertaken in 21 centres in 17 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America (including the Caribbean). Each centre recruited cases and controls from a variable number of collaborating hospitals. Women were eligible as cases if they were aged 20–44 years (15–49 in three centres), had been admitted to a collaborating hospital between Feb 1, 1989, and Jan 31, 1995, and had a

Results

Of the 384 AMI cases, 89% in Europe and 78% in the developing countries were classified as definite. ECGs and cardiac enzyme results were available for more than 99% of cases in Europe and 90% in the developing countries. The data were insufficient in 16 women to allow their classification as definite or possible cases (table 1). All subsequent analyses exclude these “other” cases and their controls. The exclusion of the six cases and their controls common to this and a previously reported study

Discussion

Risk estimates for AMI associated with current OC use are substantially modified by the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors, and very few cases of AMI were identified among OC users who had no such risk factors and who reported a blood-pressure check before the current episode of OC use. Although current use of combined OCs was associated overall with a significantly increased risk of a first AMI, with adjusted odds ratios of about five in Europe and the developing countries, this

References (37)

  • L Rosenberg et al.

    Oral contraceptive use in relation to non-fatal myocardial infarction

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1980)
  • DE Krueger et al.

    Fatal myocardial infarction and the role of oral contraceptives

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1980)
  • D Slone et al.

    Risk of myocardial infarction in relation to current and discontinued use of oral contraceptives

    N Engl J Med

    (1981)
  • SA Adam et al.

    Oral contraception and myocardial infarction revisited: the effects of new preparations and prescribing patterns

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1981)
  • C La Vecchia et al.

    Risk factors for myocardial infarction in young women

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1987)
  • E Talbott et al.

    Reproductive history of women dying of sudden cardiac death: a case-control study

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • J Ananjevic-Pandey et al.

    Myocardial infarction in young women with reference to oral contraceptive use

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • M Thorogood et al.

    Is oral contraceptive use still associated with an increased risk of fatal myocardial infarction? Report of a case-control study

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    *

    Writing committee, study organisation, and participants listed at end of article

    View full text