Elsevier

Heart & Lung

Volume 24, Issue 4, July–August 1995, Pages 281-291
Heart & Lung

Issue in cardiovascular disease
Psychological reactions and family adjustment in shock versus no shock groups after implantation of internal cardioverter defibrillator*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9563(05)80071-8Get rights and content

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare psychological reactions and family adjustment after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implnatation in survivors who did and did not experience defibrillatory shocks the first year of recovery.

Methods: Data were collected as part of a longitudinal prospective study that examined patient and family adjustment after SCA. SCA survivors and one family member per patient were interviewed and completed questionnaires three times within the first year (hospital discharge, 6 months, and 12 months) after SCA.

Sample: Fifteen SCA survivors (13 men and 2 women) between the ages of 30 and 74 (mean 57 years) and one respective family member, usually the spouse, (mean age 53 years) participated. All SCA survivors had had primary ventricular fibrillation outside the hospital, had automatic defibrillators implanted while hospitalized, and were monitored for 1 year.

Results: Participants were divided into shock and no shock groups based on activation of their ICD the first year. The mean number of shocks received in the shock group survivors was 26, with a range of 3 to 100. Anxiety, depression, anger, and stress levels were higher for both survivors and their family members in the group that received defibrillator shocks. Denial was high throughout the entire year in all survivors. Dyadic adjustment and family coping were not found to be significantly different between the no shock and shock groups. A trend toward reduction in family social support and dyadic satisfaction was noted in both groups with time.

Conclusions: Both SCA survivors and their family members experience more psychological distress in the first year after ICD implantation if the defibrillator fires. Families in both shock and no shock groups report lower levels of family support and marital satisfaction the first year after SCA and ICD implantation.

References (28)

  • KolarJA et al.

    Psychosocial adjustment of patients with ventricular dysrhythmias

    J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (1990)
  • VlaySC et al.

    Anxiety and anger in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: responses after automatic internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation

    PACE

    (1989)
  • CooperD et al.

    The impact of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in quality of life

    Clinical Progr Electrophysiol Pacing

    (1986)
  • KerenR et al.

    Anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening arrhythmias: impact of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator

    PACE

    (1991)
  • Cited by (131)

    • Anxiety and depression as risk factors for ICD shocks and mortality in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator – A systematic review

      2022, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In six studies, ICD shocks were based on patient self-report (16%) [11,15,18,19,26,28], while two studies did not specify how ICD shocks (5%) were determined [40,42]. In the remaining studies, clinical data including registries, medical records and information from ICD devices were used to define ICD shocks and mortality (n = 31, 84%) [3,11–14,16–18,20–25,27,29–39,41,43–46]. Nineteen of the included studies (51%) described the association between baseline anxiety and ICD shocks [3,12,14–17,19–23,26–28,31,36,37,42,43], whereas nine studies (24%) described the association between baseline anxiety and mortality [12–14,22,23,25,29,30,32] (see Table 2).

    • Organ conformal electronics for cardiac therapeutics

      2020, Emerging Technologies for Heart Diseases: Volume 2: Treatments for Myocardial Ischemia and Arrhythmias
    • Improving Communication in Heart Failure Patient Care

      2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    • Using cardiac implantable electronic device data to facilitate health decision making: A design study

      2018, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, these individuals do not receive any feedback from their remote monitoring device when their CIED data is transmitted to the clinic (Skov et al., 2015). In consequence, these people can experience increased anxiety (Andersen et al., 2017; Skov et al., 2015) and have a fear of receiving a shock without any notification (Cook et al., 2013; Koopman et al., 2012; Schulz et al., 2013; Dougherty, 1995; Heller et al., 1998). Our participants, who had never received a shock, were also anxious and confused about what to expect, some even felt they may have had one without knowing it.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Supported by the National Center for Nursing Research, Postdoctoral Fellowship NRO6537-03; Psi Chapter, Sigma Theta Tau, Seattle, Wash.; and the Hester McLaws Nursing Scholarship, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.

    View full text