Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Is Resuscitation Worthwhile?,☆☆,,★★

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70114-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Study objective: To determine the epidemiology of unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the factors associated with survival after resuscitation using the Utstein style data collection. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in a 525,000-population city served by a single EMS system comprising a tiered response with physicians in the field. We studied consecutive unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests that occurred between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1995. We determined survival from cardiac arrest to discharge from hospital and the factors associated with survival. Results: Of the 809 patients for whom resuscitation was considered, 205 (25.3%) had sustained unwitnessed arrests. Cardiac origin of arrest was verified in 52% of cases. The most common noncardiac causes of arrest were trauma, intoxication, near-drowning, and hanging. In 150 patients (73.2%) the presenting rhythm was asystole, in 28 (13.6%) it was pulseless electrical activity, and in 27 (13.2%) it was ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation was attempted in 162 cases, 59 (36.4%) of whom demonstrated return of spontaneous circulation; 45 (27.8%) were hospitalized alive, and 8 (4.9%) were discharged. The survivors represented 6.7% of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors during the study period. Survival was most likely if patients presented with pulseless electrical activity; none of the patients with asystole of cardiac origin survived. Sex (P=.032), age (inverse relationship, P=.0004), scene of collapse (P=.042), and interval from call receipt to arrival of first responders (P=.004) were associated with survival. In a logistic-regression model, near-drowning remained an independent factor of survival (odds ratio, 15.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 200). A routine priority dispatching protocol differentiated cardiac arrest patients with survival potential from those who already had irreversible signs of death. Conclusion: This survey shows that survival after unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unlikely with an initial response of basic life support alone. Withdrawal of resuscitation should be considered if an adult victim of unwitnessed cardiac arrest is found in asystole and the arrest is of obvious cardiac origin. [Kuisma M, Jaara K: Unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Is resuscitation worthwhile? Ann Emerg Med July 1997;30:69-75.]

Section snippets

INTRODUCTION

Witnessed collapse, in contrast to unwitnessed collapse, has been shown to be a major determinant of survival after sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.1, 2, 3 Patients who sustain unwitnessed arrests, in whom the survival rate is low despite the effort expended in resuscitation attempts, represent approximately one third of the total cardiac arrest population.2 However, some subgroups among the population of unwitnessed cardiac arrest may benefit from resuscitation. In this study our goal

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Helsinki, the capital of Finland, has a population of 525,000 and a geographic area of 590 km2. On workdays the population swells by approximately 10%. Approximately one third of the population is younger than 16 years (16%) or older than 65 years (13.9%).

The Helsinki 112 Dispatching Center—which receives calls for medical, fire, and rescue emergencies—dispatches 34,000 urgent medical calls annually.3 The center also serves the surrounding province of Uusimaa, increasing the population served

RESULTS

The total number of deaths from all causes in Helsinki during the study period was 1,012/100,000 inhabitants/year. Resuscitation was considered (no irreversible signs of death) for 809 out-of-hospital patients, 205 of whom (25.3%) sustained unwitnessed cardiac arrest. The mean±SD age of the patients was 56.7±21.2 years; 144 (70.2%) were men. Eight (3.9%) were younger than 16 years.

In 162 of the 205 cases, resuscitation was attempted, and 59 of the 162 (36.4%) demonstrated ROSC. Forty-five

DISCUSSION

Survival of unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was low (4.9% of patients were discharged alive from the hospital) as expected, although not so near zero as the rates in most studies (Table 3). The survivors represented a small subset of all survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (6.7%), in accordance with the findings of most previous studies.2, 3, 7, 8 In only one study have the survivors of unwitnessed cardiac arrest been reported to represent a remarkable proportion of all

Acknowledgements

We thank Per Rosenberg, MD, PhD, for valuable comments; Anneli Ojajärvi, MSc, for statistical review; and the Laerdal Foundation and Finnish Society of Intensive Care for financial support.

Cited by (53)

  • Cardiac arrest with initial arrest rhythm of pulseless electrical activity: Do rhythm characteristics correlate with outcome?

    2015, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    To our knowledge, this is the only study exploring the association of cardiac rhythm characteristics and outcome after PEA cardiac arrest. Pulseless electrical activity is a disease with high mortality and diverse etiologies [4-10]. Often, a standardized treatment algorithm is deployed that is the same for each patient in PEA regardless of the etiology, particularly in the prehospital setting, due to the time critical nature of the disease and lack of a clear identifiable etiology during resuscitation [13].

  • Survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with initial asystole or pulseless electrical activity and subsequent shockable rhythms

    2013, Resuscitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Historically, the relative success of defibrillation at correcting shockable forms of cardiac arrest has resulted in a strong emphasis on the treatment of patients with both ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). In contrast, due to their poor prognoses both pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole are often considered non-survivable rhythms.1–5 The nature of cardiac care and resuscitation has been shifting over the last 50 years and EMS systems have observed a steady decrease in the incidence of shockable rhythms (VF and pulseless VT) in cardiac arrest.

  • Out-of-Hospital Unwitnessed Cardiopulmonary Collapse and No-Bystander CPR: A Practical Addition to Resuscitation Termination Guidelines

    2008, Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In 2004, Haukoos et al. reported that unwitnessed arrest could predict lack of survival with a Glasgow Coma Score above 12, which supports the data presented in this study (12). A prospective Finnish study also showed unlikely survival to hospital discharge after unwitnessed cardiopulmonary collapse in an EMS system that included physician responders in the field (7). From the opposite perspective, the data we report are consistent with multiple studies that show increased survival when cardiopulmonary collapse is witnessed and there is bystander CPR (7–10,19–24).

View all citing articles on Scopus

From the Helsinki City Emergency Medical Services, Helsinki, Finland.

☆☆

Supported by the Laerdal Foundation and the Finnish Society of Intensive Care.

Reprint no. 47/1/81675

★★

Address for reprints: Markku Kuisma, MD, MQ Helsinki City EMS, Agricolankatu 15 A, FIN00530 Helsinki, Finland

View full text