Original ContributionsAccuracy of coronary flow measurements performed by means of Doppler wires
Introduction
Easy and selective measurements of coronary volume flow in patients has long been a dream. Methods based on thermodilution or angiography were available, but all had at least the drawback of being complicated. The development of Doppler catheters in the mid1980s represented, therefore, a major step. In 1992, Cardiometrics (Mountain View, California, USA) introduced the “FloWire®”, a disposable Doppler guide wire. This device, described in detail by Doucette et al. (1992), is now available with diameter 0.018″ or 0.014″ (0.46 mm or 0.36 mm). The piezoelectrical crystal situated at the tip of the 0.014″ wire emits ultrasonic bursts of frequency 15 MHz and duration 1.1 μs, at a repetition frequency of 15 to 117 kHz, depending on the selected blood velocity scale. The beam divergence is roughly 15o (half angle); the range gate location is 4.2 mm and the sample volume width approximately 2 mm. The FloWire® is connected to an apparatus (FloMap®) that calculates every 10 ms the spectrum of the blood velocities by fast Fourier transform and the peak velocity (PV), which is the maximal blood velocity found in the spectrum (Fig. 1). The FloMap® also displays the average peak velocity (APV), which is the average value of the PV over the last two cardiac cycles. Evidently, the PV and the APV reflect the two corresponding true velocities only if these are permanently included in the sample volume.
The 0.018″ FloWire® has been validated in vitro and in dogs by Doucette et al. (1992). However, these authors still had to trace the envelope of the recorded velocity spectra manually. Furthermore, they pointed out that they “...did not accurately reproduce the conditions likely to be encountered clinically.” Velocity or flow rate measurements performed in patients during cardiac catheterization may, indeed, be not quite comparable to validation measurements in animals. For example, validation measurements are often limited to a single arterial branch, due to the necessity of measuring the flow simultaneously with a recognised “gold standard” (e.g., an electromagnetic flowmeter or the “beaker/stop-watch” method). Moreover, it is sometimes impossible in patients to position the transducer optimally. In general, the operator cannot be certain that the sample volume really includes the maximal velocity, especially in larger coronary arteries. These points may partly explain why there are already many Doppler wire publications dealing with flow velocities, but only a few involving volume flows (flow rates). For these and other reasons (see, for example, the Limitations section in Doucette et al. 1992), and because the Doppler wire is presently the most promising device available for selective and subselective flow measurements in coronary arteries, we wanted to investigate the accuracy of these measurements in patients. A direct approach with a “gold standard” being, of course, impossible, we have used an indirect method based on the fact that, at vessel bifurcations, the entry flow is equal to the sum of the two exit flows.
Section snippets
Data acquisition in patients
In 21 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for various diseases, velocity measurements were performed in 1 or 2 (or exceptionally 3) coronary arterial bifurcations in the following manner. After the usual acquisition of the left and/or right diagnostic coronary angiograms, two more or less orthogonal projections that showed a vessel bifurcation composed of three angiographically normal segments without superposition with other opacified vessels (Fig. 2) were selected and reset on our
Results
Table 1 shows the ranges and mean values of the APV, CSA and flow rates Q. The heart rates ranged from 48 to 101 beats/min, and the aortic root pressures from 72 to 125 mmHg. The three mean heart rates associated with the first, the second, and the third velocity measurements at the 36 bifurcations were 73.5 ± 14.4 beats/min, 73.4 ± 15.0 beats/min, and 74.3 ± 14.7 beats/min. The three sets of heart rates were not significantly different (p = 0.96). The three mean aortic pressures were 97.5 ±
Discussion
Easy, selective and reliable measurements of coronary flow rates in patients may become important for basic or clinical studies, and for decisional purposes. For example, they would be the most direct way of assessing regional flow reserve, regional myocardial perfusion or steal phenomena. The present study was undertaken because the accuracy of coronary flow measurements in patients seemed to be controversial (although it had, to our knowledge, never been assessed). A direct accuracy
Conclusion
Coronary flow measurements performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory by means of 0.014″ Doppler wires and biplane angiography appear to be reasonably accurate (except perhaps for very low flow rates).
References (11)
- et al.
Measurement of volumetric coronary blood flow by simultaneous intravascular two-dimensional and Doppler ultrasoundValidation in an animal model
Am Heart J
(1994) - et al.
Blood flow imaging and volume flow quantitation with intravascular ultrasound
Ultrasound Med Biol
(1998) - et al.
The effects of ionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary hyperemia in patients during coronary angiography
Am Heart J
(1992) - et al.
Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity
Circulation
(1992) - et al.
Position control of intravascular Doppler guidewireConcept of a tracking indicator and its clinical implications
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn
(1998)
Cited by (14)
Characterizing momentum change and viscous loss of a hemodynamic endpoint in assessment of coronary lesions
2007, Journal of BiomechanicsQuantitative IVUS blood flow: Validation in vitro, in animals and in patients
2003, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyShear stress and vascular remodeling: Study of cardiac allograft coronary artery disease as a model of diffuse atherosclerosis
2002, Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationHigh shear stress after successful balloon angioplasty is associated with restenosis and target lesion revascularization
2002, American Heart JournalCitation Excerpt :WSS was computed proximal and distal to the lesion and in the lesion, before and after treatment, and at a 6-month repeat angiogram by use of the Hagen-Poiseuille formula14: WSS = 4μQ/πR3, with μ being blood viscosity, taken to be constant at 0.003 Ns/m2, Q being the volumetric blood flow in mL/s, and R being the radius of the coronary lumen at the site of the flow measurement. Volumetric flow was calculated from blood velocity (assuming parabolic flow) measured by means of intravascular Doppler scanning with the validated formula14,15: Q = CSA × APV/2, in which CSA is the cross-sectional area and APV is the baseline (before adenosine administration) average peak velocity. Minimal and reference vessel CSA were measured by means of videodensitometry with a computer-assisted quantitative coronary angiography analysis system (CAAS II system, Pie Medical Data, Maastricht, The Netherlands).
Effects of exercise training on vascular function and myocardial perfusion
2001, Cardiology ClinicsCitation Excerpt :The accuracy and reproducibility of flow velocity measurements in patients has been recently assessed. When used with QCA, the relative flow error decreased from 30% at a flow of 30 mL/min to 13% at a flow of 160 mL/min.18 This implies that the accuracy of Doppler flow measurements increases with higher flow velocities.
A dual-mode catheter for cardiac output monitoring
2020, IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS