Clinical Investigation
Interventional Cardiology
Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.015Get rights and content

Background

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalizations remain extremely challenging procedures. With improvements in technology and techniques, success rates for recanalization of CTO continue to improve. However, the clinical benefits of this practice remain unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of CTO recanalization on clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing CTO recanalization to medical management. Data were extracted in duplicate and analyzed by a random effects model.

Results

We did not identify any randomized controlled trials or observational studies comparing CTO recanalization to a planned medical management. We did identify 13 observational studies comparing outcomes after successful vs failed CTO recanalization attempt. These studies encompassed 7,288 patients observed over a weighted average follow-up of 6 years. There were 721 (14.3%) deaths of 5,056 patients after successful CTO recanalization compared to 390 deaths (17.5%) of 2,232 patients after failed CTO recanalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.72). Successful recanalization was associated with a significant reduction in subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.17-0.27) but not in myocardial infarction (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.25) or major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.21). In the 6 studies that reported angina status, successful recanalization was associated with a significant reduction in residual/recurrent angina (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.67).

Conclusions

In highly selected patients considered for CTO recanalization, successful attempts appear to be associated with an improvement in mortality and with a reduction for the need for CABG as compared to failed recanalization. However, given the observational nature of the reviewed evidence, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Section snippets

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the standards set forth by the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) statement.5 We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (up to January 30, 2009). We used the following keywords: “chronic total occlusion,” “percutaneous coronary intervention,” “angioplasty,” and “stent.” We limited our search to the English and French language. In addition, we hand-searched references of retrieved

Results

We did not identify any randomized controlled trial (RCT) or observational study comparing CTO recanalization to a planned medical management strategy. We identified 13 observational studies comparing successful CTO recanalization to a strategy of medical management as a result of attempted but failed CTO recanalization.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Figure 1 shows the flow diagram leading to our article selection. Included studies encompassed 7,288 patients treated between 1979

Discussion

Despite increasing interest in the use of PCI for CTO, we found no randomized or observational studies directly comparing recanalization to medical management. Therefore, the current meta-analysis applies only to clinical outcomes after attempted recanalization. In this selected population, we found that successful CTO recanalization was associated with a 44% reduction in mortality, a 78% reduction in subsequent CABG, and a 55% reduction in residual/recurrent angina. Successful recanalization

Conclusion

In the highly selected population of patients who underwent successful recanalization of a CTO, long-term outcomes appear to be improved. Our findings support the evidence suggesting a survival advantage associated with successful versus failed attempt of CTO recanalization as far as it is possible short of an RCT. However, based on the observational nature of the evidence, randomized control trials comparing recanalization to a planed medical management are needed to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgement

Dr Rinfret is a junior clinician-scientist supported by the Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec (FRSQ).

References (34)

  • StoneG.W. et al.

    Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part I

    Circulation

    (2005)
  • StoneG.W. et al.

    Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part II

    Circulation

    (2005)
  • RathoreS. et al.

    Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice

    Circ Cardiovasc Interv

    (2009)
  • ThompsonC.A. et al.

    Retrograde techniques and the impact of operator volume on percutaneous intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions an early U.S. experience

    JACC Cardiovasc Interv

    (2009)
  • MoherD. et al.

    Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • HoyeA. et al.

    Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: the Thoraxcenter experience 1992-2002

    Eur Heart J

    (2005)
  • SueroJ.A. et al.

    Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2001)
  • IvanhoeR.J. et al.

    Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Primary success, restenosis, and long-term clinical follow-up

    Circulation

    (1992)
  • OlivariZ. et al.

    Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE)

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • NoguchiT. et al.

    Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Determinants of primary success and long-term clinical outcome

    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

    (2000)
  • PrasadA. et al.

    Trends in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: a 25-year experience from the Mayo Clinic

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2007)
  • FinciL. et al.

    Long-term results of successful and failed angioplasty for chronic total coronary arterial occlusion

    Am J Cardiol

    (1990)
  • ValentiR. et al.

    Impact of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention on survival in patients with at least one chronic total occlusion

    Eur Heart J

    (2008)
  • DrozdJ. et al.

    Percutaneous angioplasty of chronically occluded coronary arteries: long-term clinical follow-up

    Kardiol Pol

    (2006)
  • WarrenR.J. et al.

    Coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion reduces the need for subsequent coronary bypass surgery

    Am Heart J

    (1990)
  • AngioiM. et al.

    Is percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in chronic total coronary occlusion justified? Long term results in a series of 201 patients

    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss

    (1995)
  • AzizS. et al.

    Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: improved survival for patients with successful revascularization compared to a failed procedure

    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

    (2007)
  • Cited by (351)

    • Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Medicare Beneficiaries

      2023, Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
    • Why and How Should We Treat Chronic Total Occlusion? Evolution of State-of-the-Art Methods and Future Directions

      2022, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the large OPEN-CTO (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures) registry, 72% of patients underwent CTO PCI for symptom relief, and 11% for ischemia reduction.6 In observational studies that compared outcomes after successful vs failed CTO PCI, patients who had their CTO opened had a 62% reduction in the risk of subsequent angina.12,13 CTO PCI is also associated with substantial improvement in several aspects of quality of life (QOL), including better physical functioning, less angina frequency, and overall QOL as assessed with the Seattle-Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), in the short and long terms.6,14

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest/disclosure: None.

    View full text