Blood pressure and left ventricular mass
Systolic and Fourth- and Fifth-Phase Diastolic Blood Pressure from Ages 8 to 18 Years: Project HeartBeat!

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.014Get rights and content

Background

Systolic and fourth-phase and fifth-phase diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP4, DBP5) have appeared to differ in their patterns of age-related change, and SBP and DBP5 differ in their respective associations with anthropometric variables. Project HeartBeat! investigated trajectories of change in SBP, DBP4, and SBP5 with age and their relationships with indices of adiposity, controlling for energy intake, physical activity, and sexual maturation.

Methods

Project HeartBeat! was a mixed longitudinal study in 678 black and white girls and boys aged 8, 11, or 14 years at first examination, followed at 4-month intervals for up to 4 years (1991–1995). A statistical model was estimated for the trajectory of change in each blood pressure measure from ages 8 to 18 years.

Results

For SBP, DBP4, and DBP5, the trajectories were sigmoid, parabolic, and linear in form, respectively. SBP and DBP4 differed significantly by gender; DBP4 and DBP5 were significantly related to race. Adjusted for age, gender, and race, all relationships of adiposity-related variables (percent body fat, abdominal circumference, skinfold thickness, and BMI and its fat and fat-free components) with SBP were positive and significant. Corresponding relationships for DBP4 were notably weaker but significant, and for DBP5, weak or not significant. After adjusting for diet, physical inactivity, and maturation, no DBP5 relationship with adiposity indices remained significant.

Conclusions

SBP, DBP4, and DBP5 are distinct in patterns of change with age, relationships to gender and race, and patterns of association with multiple anthropometric indices related to adiposity.

Introduction

The Bogalusa Heart Study and the Muscatine Study of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in childhood and adolescence, begun in the early 1970s, contributed importantly to a body of data useful for establishing population norms for blood pressure levels.1 The Task Force on Control of Blood Pressure in Children was convened in 1977 by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and reported standards2 for children's blood pressure—systolic (SBP) and fourth-phase diastolic (DBP4)—by gender and age, for those aged 2–18 years. A second report3 from the Task Force provided revised recommendations and called for measuring DBP4 for infants and children aged ≤12 years but, for comparability with adults, fifth-phase DBP (DBP5) for those aged 13–18 years. An update4 provided further normative data by incorporating adjustment for body height, and it called for use of DBP5 as the preferred measure of DBP for all age groups. A fourth report5 maintained use of DBP5 as the standard measure for DBP, except when “very low” or zero values are observed, in which case DBP4 should be used.

Among 129 published reports of independently conducted cross-sectional blood pressure surveys in children worldwide, about half of the studies reported diastolic pressures as DBP4 and half as DBP5.6, 7 As a result, blood pressure levels and patterns of change with age could be compared among these three measures—SBP, DBP4, and DBP5. Each measure increased with age in childhood and adolescence, but their patterns of change differed: SBP showed a more clearly curvilinear pattern of change than either measure of DBP; both SBP and DBP5 showed an unexpected decrease in girls in their late teens; and DBP5 showed a continuous increase across the 6- to 18-year age range.

Analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES) had demonstrated that, among those aged 7–19 years, DBP5 differed from SBP in its pattern of correlation with each of several anthropometric characteristics (weight, height, triceps skinfold, upper-arm girth).8, 9 Correlations for SBP with these measures were stronger than those for DBP5, at every age. They varied systematically for both SBP and DBP5 for successive 2-year age groups, being weakest in the early teenage years.

For this report, data from Project HeartBeat!10 were used to address two central questions: (1) Do SBP, DBP4, and DBP5 differ in their growth trajectories (age-related changes) from ages 8 to 18 years? (2) Do these three measures of blood pressure differ in their relationship to selected anthropometric indicators, including indicators of adiposity, when adjusted for energy intake, physical activity, and sexual maturation, as well as for age, gender, and race?

Section snippets

Methods

Project HeartBeat!10 was a mixed longitudinal study of the development of CVD risk factors in childhood and adolescence conducted near Houston in The Woodlands and Conroe TX. Recruitment and enrollment of study participants and the full inventory of examination components have been described previously.11 Participants were placed into one of three age cohorts: 8 years (Cohort 1), 11 years (Cohort 2), or 14 years (Cohort 3) at entry (a total of 678 participants; 49.1% girls and 20.1% blacks).

Trajectories of Change in SBP, DBP4, and DBP5 with Age

The trajectories of change in SBP, DBP4, and DBP5 from ages 8 to 18 years, based on the models presented in Table 3, are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3. The models were developed as described above, and significant terms (p≤0.05, where Estimate/SE≥1.96) are shown. The main points to note are (1) for SBP, only race was not significant, but all three levels of age terms—age, age2, and age3—were significant (p<0.01); (2) for DBP4, unlike SBP, race was significant but not age3; and (3) for

Discussion

The two central questions posed for this analysis may be answered in the affirmative: both the trajectories of age-related change and the relationships with selected anthropometric indices differ among the three blood pressure measures: SBP, DBP4, and DBP5. SBP is strongly dependent on age, gender, and anthropometric variables. Associations of SBP with lean mass (FFMI) are stronger than with variables representing fat mass (FMI and the other anthropometric variables). Measures of body fat are

References (39)

  • C. Brotons et al.

    Blood pressure by age in childhood and adolescence: a review of 129 surveys worldwide

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • D.R. Labarthe et al.

    Epidemiology of blood pressure in childhood: an international perspective

    Semin Nephrol

    (1989)
  • D.R. Labarthe et al.

    Blood pressure during growth and development

    Ann Clin Res

    (1984)
  • HANES Examination staff procedures manual for the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1971–1973, Part 15a, Chapter 11, Blood pressure

    (1972)
  • D.R. Labarthe et al.

    Development of cardiovascular risk factors from ages 8 to 18 in Project HeartBeat!Study design and patterns of change in plasma total cholesterol concentration

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • J.A. Grunbaum et al.

    Recruitment and enrollment for Project HeartBeat!Achieving the goals of minority inclusion

    Ethn Dis

    (1996)
  • J.D. Curb et al.

    Training and certification of blood pressure observers

    Hypertension

    (1983)
  • M.W. Gillman et al.

    Blood pressure measurement in childhood epidemiological studies

    Circulation

    (1995)
  • N. Cameron

    The methods of auxological anthropometry

  • Cited by (23)

    • Long-term predictors of blood pressure among adolescents during an 18-month school-based obesity prevention intervention

      2014, Journal of Adolescent Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      An interesting finding of the present study is that there was a significant gender difference in systolic BP increases but not in diastolic BP increases. Furthermore, males had a precipitous increase in the trajectory of systolic BP for ages 12–17 years, and a sizeable gap in systolic BP between males and females was revealed at age 18 years [27]. The larger increases of systolic BP in males may contribute to higher prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among males than females [9] as hypertension in adolescence is predominantly influenced by isolated systolic hypertension, without diastolic hypertension.

    • Project HeartBeat!. Concept, Development, and Design

      2009, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This paper provides the rationale and design of Project HeartBeat! as background to the reports that follow in this supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.1–13 The concept of a longitudinal study of “growth” of risk factors, as well as development of the research proposal and design and methods of the study, are highlighted.

    • Findings from Project HeartBeat!. Their Importance for CVD Prevention

      2009, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The factors that determine the levels of these three measures of blood pressure are evidently distinct, as are their trajectories over the same age range of 8–18 years. Increase in both fatness and FFMI was significantly associated with increasing SBP, and in models adjusted for age, gender, and race, successively less strongly with both DBP4 and DBP5.4 After adjustment for energy intake, MVPA, and sexual maturation, these associations remained significant for SBP, were weakened notably for DBP4, and were no longer significant for DBP5.

    • Blood Lipids, Blood Pressure, and BMI in Childhood and Adolescence. Background to Project HeartBeat!

      2009, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Longstanding concern about early development of these risk factors, which also include tobacco use and diabetes, continues, and in view of the now-epidemic occurrence of childhood obesity, warrants fuller attention and understanding.20–23 This supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine presents articles2–14 from continuing analysis of data from Project HeartBeat! that contributes to the understanding of this urgent public health issue.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text