Usefulness of a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device to detect clinically significant valvular regurgitation in hospitalized patients

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.066

The American Journal of Cardiology

Volume 93, Issue 8, 15 April 2004, Pages 1069-1072

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.066 Get rights and content

Abstract

The accuracy of a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound (HCCU) device for the diagnosis of valvular regurgitations using color-flow Doppler was assessed. One hundred twenty hospitalized patients with at least mild valvular regurgitation by standard echocardiography were evaluated by 2 cardiologists using HCCU. The HCCU operator identified 99% of clinically significant valvular regurgitations and assessed the severity correctly in 83% of cases. For mild regurgitation, the HCCU sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 93%, respectively, resulting in correct assessments of severity in 71% of cases. HCCU used by trained cardiologists has high sensitivity for the detection and accurate assessment of the severity of clinically relevant valvular regurgitation.

References (16)

J.R. Roelandt et al.
Ultrasonic real time imaging with a hand-held scanner. Part II—initial clinical experience
Ultrasound Med Biol
(1978)
R.L. Popp
The physical examination of the futureechocardiography as part of the assessment
ACC Curr Rev
(1998)
G.J. Perry et al.
Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1987)
L. Thomas et al.
The mitral regurgitation indexan echocardiographic guide to severity
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1999)
C.M. Tribouilloy et al.
Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation by measuring the width of the vena contracta with Doppler color flow imaginga clinical study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2000)
A.L. Klein et al.
Age-related prevalence of valvular regurgitation in normal subjectsa comprehensive color flow examination of 118 volunteers
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(1990)
C.J. Bruce et al.
Utility of hand-carried ultrasound devices used by cardiologists with and without significant echocardiographic experience in the cardiology inpatient and outpatient settings
Am J Cardiol
(2002)
K.T. Spencer et al.
Point of service echocardiography
ACC Curr Rev
(2002)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

Accuracy and Efficacy of Hand-Held Echocardiography in Diagnosing Valve Disease: A Systematic Review
2018, American Journal of Medicine
Citation Excerpt :
The lack of spectral Doppler in current HHE devices prevents the quantification of flow velocities and hence limits the ability to grade the severity of regurgitant and especially stenotic lesions. Color Doppler, which is integrated into hand-held devices, generally allows for differentiation of mild from severe regurgitant lesions very accurately, even in the absence of spectral Doppler.15 In addition, chamber size provides important additional information on the severity of chronic regurgitant valvular lesions.
In recent years, advances in technology have enabled hand-held echocardiography (HHE) to generate high-quality 2-dimensional and color Doppler images. As these devices become smaller, simpler, and more affordable, the question of whether HHE can augment or replace auscultation as the primary mode of cardiovascular diagnosis has become increasingly more relevant. If widely implemented, HHE has the potential for significant cost savings and better resource utilization. This review examines studies comparing the sensitivities of auscultation, HHE, and standard echocardiography in detecting various valvular lesions and discusses why current evidence supports the use of HHE to augment the physical examination, which can lead to more reliable and rapid bedside diagnoses, triage, and appropriate treatment of structural cardiac abnormalities.
Hand-carried ultrasound devices in pediatric cardiology: Clinical experience with three different devices in 110 patients
2010, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Citation Excerpt :
Also, the usefulness of these devices in cardiology patients for the assessment of cardiac chamber size and function has been addressed.5-7 The use of such devices also as a brief complementary tool in the clinical examination of critically ill patients has been recommended.8-10 Also, in different settings, such as pacemaker clinics,11 stress testing,12 pulmonary function laboratories,13 after cardiac surgery,14,15 in ICUs,9 and in general medicine,16-18 the use of HCU devices has been appreciated.
The aims of this study were to determine the usefulness of hand-carried ultrasound devices in pediatric cardiology and to compare the performance of three different hand-carried ultrasound devices in a pediatric cardiology outpatient clinic and intensive care unit.
One hundred ten patients (49 male; mean age, 6.4 ± 5.2 years; range 0.1–38 years) with congenital heart defects or innocent heart murmurs were examined using Siemens Acuson P10, Siemens Acuson P50, and Philips CX 50 systems. The quality of images and the accuracy of B-mode measurements were compared with those obtained using a standard echocardiographic system (Philips iE33).
Fifty-nine patients were examined with the Siemens Acuson P10, 29 with the Siemens Acuson P50, and 22 with the Philips CX 50 system. There were no significant differences in B-mode measurements. The Acuson P10 system, however, showed significantly lower image quality, with 64.54% of all studies considered of excellent quality compared with 92.83% with the Acuson P50 and 95.52% with the CX 50 (P < .05) and a mean quality score (1 = fair, 5 = excellent) of 3.5 versus 4.57 with the Acuson P50 and 4.86 with the CX 50 (P < .05). This was attributed to the limited capacity for accurate diagnosis in children with body weights < 10 kg and complex heart defects.
Hand-carried ultrasound devices represent a valuable alternative to standard echocardiographic systems in pediatric cardiology. In particular, systems including all echocardiographic modalities offer unlimited versatility in outpatient and intensive care.
Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: A consensus statement of the American society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians
2010, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Citation Excerpt :
The small size of these platforms allows their use in nearly any emergent setting and has shown potential for pre-hospital diagnostic use.50 In the emergency department, physician use of portable machines substantially increases the detection of cardiovascular abnormalities over physical examination alone and increases diagnostic accuracy.51-56 The need to use the same ultrasound platform to image noncardiac structures will have the greatest influence over platform selection, because not all devices suitable for cardiac use will accommodate the transducers required for other imaging applications.
The use of ultrasound has developed over the last 50 years into an indispensable first-line test for the cardiac evaluation of symptomatic patients. The technologic miniaturization and improvement in transducer technology, as well as the implementation of educational curriculum changes in residency training programs and specialty practice, have facilitated the integration of focused cardiac ultrasound into practice by specialties such as emergency medicine. In the emergency department, focused cardiac ultrasound has become a fundamental tool to expedite the diagnostic evaluation of the patient at the bedside and to initiate emergent treatment and triage decisions by the emergency physician.
Comparison of Hand-Carried Ultrasound Assessment of the Inferior Vena Cava and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Predicting Readmission After Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
2008, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
We sought to compare the value of serial assessment with hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) of the inferior vena cava (IVC) with brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to identify patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) who will be readmitted or seek emergency department treatment after hospital discharge.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause for hospitalization and, once hospitalized, patients with CHF frequently are readmitted. To date, no reliable index exists that can be used to predict whether patients with ADHF can be discharged with low readmission likelihood.
A total of 75 patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of ADHF were followed. All patients were assessed at admission and discharge with the use of routine clinical evaluation, BNP measurement, and HCU evaluation of the IVC by physicians with limited training in ultrasound.
During the 30-day follow-up, 31 patients were rehospitalized or presented to the emergency department. Patients who were subsequently readmitted could not be differentiated from those who were not readmitted by their demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, presence of symptoms/signs suggestive of persistent congestion, hospital length of stay, or net volume removal. Routine laboratory tests, including assessment of renal function, also failed to predict readmission with the exception of serum sodium. Although admission BNP was similar in patients readmitted and not readmitted, pre-discharge log-transformed BNP was greater in patients who subsequently were readmitted. Patients who required repeat hospitalization had a larger IVC size on admission as well as at discharge. In addition, patients who were readmitted had persistently plethoric IVCs with lower IVC collapsibility indexes. At discharge, only serum sodium, log-transformed BNP, IVC size, and collapsibility were statistically significant predictors of readmission.
This study confirms that, once hospitalized, patients with CHF frequently are readmitted. Bedside evaluation of the IVC with a HCU device at the time of admission and discharge, as well as pre-discharge BNP, identified patients admitted with ADHF who were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital.
A Comparison by Medicine Residents of Physical Examination Versus Hand-Carried Ultrasound for Estimation of Right Atrial Pressure
2007, American Journal of Cardiology
Citation Excerpt :
Unfortunately, the size, complexity, and cost of a standard-platform ultrasound machine make their use at the point of care difficult. Many of these limitations are readily addressed with HCU technology.12–16 The substantially lower cost of HCU devices as well as their increased portability and ease of use greatly increase their utility at the point of care.
Physicians’ ability to accurately estimate right atrial (RA) pressure from bedside evaluation of the jugular venous waveform is poor, particularly when performed by physicians in training. Conventional ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) accurately predicts RA pressure, but the cost, lack of portability, and specialized training required to acquire and interpret the data render this modality impractical for routine clinical use. The objective of this study was to compare physical examination with hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) in the detection of elevated RA pressure (>10 mm Hg). After limited training (4 hours didactic and 20 studies), 4 internal medicine residents using an HCU device estimated RA pressure from images of the IVC in 40 consecutive patients <1 hour after right-sided cardiac catheterization. RA pressure was also estimated from examination of the jugular venous pulse (JVP) in 40 patients before right-sided cardiac catheterization. RA pressure was successfully estimated from HCU images of the IVC in 90% of patients, compared with 63% from JVP examination. The sensitivity for predicting RA pressure >10 mm Hg was 82% with HCU and 14% from JVP inspection. Specificities were similar between the techniques. Overall accuracies were 71% using HCU and 60% with JVP assessment. In conclusion, internal medicine residents with brief training in echocardiography can more frequently and more accurately predict elevated RA pressure using HCU measurements of the IVC than with physical examination of the JVP.
Comparison of effectiveness of hand-carried ultrasound to bedside cardiovascular physical examination
2005, American Journal of Cardiology
This study compared the accuracy of cardiovascular diagnoses by medical students operating a small hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) device with that of board-certified cardiologists using standard physical examinations. Sixty-one patients (38% women; mean age 70 ± 19 years) with clinically significant cardiac disease had HCU studies performed by 1 of 2 medical students with 18 hours of training in cardiac ultrasound and physical examinations by 1 of 5 cardiologists. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by standard echocardiography. Two-hundred thirty-nine abnormal findings were detected by standard echocardiography. The students correctly identified 75% (180 of 239) of the pathologies, whereas cardiologists found 49% (116 of 239) (p <0.001). The students’ diagnostic specificity of 87% was also greater than cardiologists’ specificity of 76% (p <0.001). For nonvalvular pathologies (115 findings), students’ sensitivity was 61%, compared with 47% for cardiologists (p = 0.040). There were 124 clinically significant valvular lesions (111 regurgitations, 13 stenoses). Students’ and cardiologists’ sensitivities for recognizing lesions that cause a systolic murmur were 93% and 62% (p <0.001), respectively. Students’ sensitivity for diagnosing lesions that produce a diastolic murmur was 75%; cardiologists recognized 16% of these lesions (p <0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of medical students using an HCU device after brief echocardiographic training to detect valvular disease, left ventricular dysfunction, enlargement, and hypertrophy was superior to that of experienced cardiologists performing cardiac physical examinations.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Brief reportUsefulness of a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device to detect clinically significant valvular regurgitation in hospitalized patients

Abstract

Ultrasound Med Biol

ACC Curr Rev

J Am Coll Cardiol

J Am Coll Cardiol

J Am Coll Cardiol

J Am Soc Echocardiogr

Am J Cardiol

ACC Curr Rev

Brief report
Usefulness of a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device to detect clinically significant valvular regurgitation in hospitalized patients