Brief reportsComparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis
References (9)
- et al.
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?
Am J Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shockSHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock
N Engl J Med
(1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 2004 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.