Coronary artery disease
Erythropoietin to Augment Myocardial Salvage Induced by Coronary Thrombolysis in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.050Get rights and content

To determine whether the administration of erythropoietin (EPO) early after the onset of ischemia could enhance the preservation of jeopardized myocardium by reperfusion, 236 patients admitted <6 hours after the onset of chest pain indicative of acute coronary syndromes confirmed to be ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarctions who were treated with tenecteplase to induce coronary thrombolysis were studied. Patients were randomized to standard care or standard care plus the administration of a single dose of EPO 30,000 IU intravenously immediately before the onset of treatment with tenecteplase. The primary end point was enzymatically estimated infarct size. The results indicated that infarct size index was virtually identical in the 2 groups, with a mean ± SE of 13.2 ± 0.1 creatine kinase-MB gram equivalents in controls and 12.4 ± 0.9 creatine kinase-MB gram equivalents in patients treated with EPO. In conclusion, although the early administration of EPO was apparently safe, it did not enhance the preservation of jeopardized ischemic myocardium.

Section snippets

Methods

We enrolled and randomized 254 primarily male patients admitted to Rashid Hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, very early after the onset of myocardial infarction and are reporting the results from the 236 for whom we were able to acquire complete blood sample sets (i.e., sets of samples that arrived at our laboratory in Vermont without thawing, without clots, and intact). Patients were studied after the acquisition of written informed consent and in accordance with a protocol approved by

Results

The patients treated with EPO were similar to those who were not (Table 1). The concentrations in plasma of EPO assayed by a 2-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay procedure with kits from MD Biosciences (St. Paul, Minnesota) 30 minutes after administration of the thrombolytic drug were profoundly elevated in the patients treated with EPO, averaging 8,554 ± 812 mU/ml compared to the normal concentrations in those who were not treated with the drug (10 ± 1 mU/ml). Furthermore, in samples

Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate that the administration of EPO in quantities comparable to those that have been reported to provide tissue protection in the hearts of experimental animals did not change the extent of infarction in patients with STEMIs treated with the early administration of a thrombolytic drug. The echocardiographic results indicated that no functional differences were present between the 2 groups and were concordant with the lack of differences in enzymatic estimates of

Acknowledgment

We thank Rania Medhat Seliem and Faiza Ahmed Al Najjar of the Rashid Hospital laboratory; Wafig Hassan Shafiq, head of the Health Informatics Unit at Rashid Hospital; Rahila Sarwar Bhatti and the staff of the Coronary Care Unit at Rashid Hospital; Patricia Baumann and Dagnija Neimane for technical and biostatistical support; and Lori Dales for preparation of the report.

References (29)

  • C.J. Parsa et al.

    A novel protective effect of erythropoietin in the infarcted heart

    J Clin Invest

    (2003)
  • F. Prunier et al.

    Delayed erythropoietin therapy reduces post-MI cardiac remodeling only at a dose that mobilizes endothelial progenitor cells

    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol

    (2007)
  • T. Rui et al.

    Erythropoietin prevents the acute myocardial inflammatory response induced by ischemia/reperfusion via induction of AP-1

    Cardiovasc Res

    (2005)
  • B. Xu et al.

    Recombinant human erythropoietin pretreatment attenuates myocardial infarct size: a possible mechanism involves heat shock protein 70 and attenuation of nuclear factor-kappaB

    Ann Clin Lab Sci

    (2005)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Erythropoietin and the heart: Physiological effects and the therapeutic perspective

      2014, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The outcomes included all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, cardiac function by LV ejection fraction and infarct size. Thirteen clinical studies of rhEpo versus control (1564 participants) were included [44,47–50,94–101]. As indicated above, these authors also concluded that rhEpo administration did not improve LVEF (P = 0.68), and that it had no effect on infarct size (assessed by cardiac MRI [P = 0.90] or by serum peak value of CK-MB [P = 0.87]).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was partly supported by a Shaikh Hamdan Bin Rashed Al Maktoum Award (Dubai, United Arab Emirates).

    View full text