Coronary artery disease
Comparison of Outcome of Recurrent Versus First ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from National Israel Surveys 1998 to 2006)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.332Get rights and content

Patients with recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI), who represent ≤35% of hospitalized patients with AMI, are at an increased risk of complications and death. Our study purpose was to compare the treatment and outcome of patients hospitalized with recurrent acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from 1998 to 2006 with those of patients with a first STEMI. We performed 5 biennial nationwide 2-month surveys during 1998 to 2006, collecting data prospectively from all patients hospitalized for AMI or acute coronary syndrome in all 25 coronary care units in Israel. The present cohort included 4,543 patients with STEMI, 3,679 (76%) with first and 864 (24%) with recurrent STEMI. The patients with recurrent STEMI were older (66 ± 13 vs 62 ± 13 years), had greater rates of diabetes, hypertension, and previous angina, had a worse Killip class on admission, and experienced more in-hospital complications. The all-cause hospital crude mortality rate was 8.1% in patients with recurrent STEMI versus 5.5% in those with a first STEMI (adjusted odds ratio 1.71 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.44), and the 1-year mortality rate was 18.9% versus 10.9%, respectively (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 2.43). From 1998 to 2006, an insignificant trend toward a 1-year mortality reduction among patients with recurrent STEMI was seen and those with a first STEMI had a significant mortality decrease. In conclusion, patients admitted for recurrent STEMI have worse in-hospital and 1-year outcomes that did not improve during the study period. An improved therapeutic approach is needed for these high-risk patients.

Section snippets

Methods

Five biennial, prospective, nationwide, 2-month surveys were conducted in all 25 operating CCUs in Israel, collecting data prospectively for all patients with AMI/ACS hospitalized during January to February 1998, February to March 2000, February to March 2002, February to March 2004, and March to April 2006. The details of these surveys, called Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS), have been previously described.16

Data on patient characteristics, in-hospital course, and management

Results

During the survey period, 7,097 patients with AMI (STEMI and non-STEMI) were hospitalized. Of the 7.097 patients, 5,394 (76%) had a first AMI and 1,703 (24%) a recurrent AMI. The first AMI population included 3,679 patients (68%) with STEMI and the recurrent AMI group included only 864 patients (51%) with STEMI. The patients with STEMI constituted the present study population. The percentage of admissions for STEMI of the total AMI admissions decreased significantly in both groups during the

Discussion

Numerous publications have reported on the decreasing incidence and improved survival rates of patients admitted with an ACS event, in general, and of patients with STEMI, in particular.13, 16, 17 However, only few reports have targeted recurrent AMI, and practically none have specifically evaluated the recurrent STEMI population, which is a higher risk subgroup of those with AMI. The present analysis of the community-based observational prospective surveys of consecutive patients with ACS

References (22)

  • K.A.A. Fox et al.

    Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999–2006

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admissions and readmissions for acute myocardial infarction in 26 Chinese cities

      2018, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, few studies have explored whether the acute effects of PM2.5 differed across strata defined by AMI etiology (ST-elevation myocardial infarction: STEMI vs. non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: NSTEMI). Recurrent AMI is associated with higher risk of complications, lower survival, and poorer quality of life relative to the initial AMI (Shotan et al., 2011). Despite best efforts at secondary prevention, the incidence rate of recurrent AMI remains high, accounting for ∼20% of hospitalized patients with AMI (Mozaffarian et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text