Original ArticleCardiovascularThe Effect of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting on Survival During 20 Postoperative Years
Section snippets
Patients and Methods
Patients from which the study sample is drawn came from 1000 patient-per-year cohorts of nonforeign, nonemergent patients undergoing primary isolated myocardial revascularization operations at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation during the years 1971 through 1989. These patients have been followed by questionnaire every 5 years. Of that group, 2001 patients underwent BITA grafting and 8123 had SITA grafting with or without accompanying vein grafts for treatment of multi-system coronary artery
Methods
Using the preoperative variables listed in Table 1, a propensity score was created to quantify the likelihood that a given patient would have received BITA grafts [5]. By matching propensity scores, 1142 BITA patients could be excellently pair-wise propensity matched to an SITA patient. The BITA patients who could not be matched were analyzed (Table 2) and were younger, taller, heavier, more likely to be male, and less likely to have abnormal left ventricular function, congestive heart failure,
Results
Overall survival of the BITA versus SITA groups (Fig 1) was 89% versus 87%, 81% versus 78%, 67% versus 58%, and 50% versus 37%, at 7, 10, 15, and 20 postoperative years, respectively (p < 0.0001). The death hazard function curves for both groups showed that the time-related risk of death continued to widen in favor of the BITA group through 20 postoperative years (Fig 2). Survival of unmatched BITA patients (75% at 15 years, Table 2) was superior to that of the matched BITA group (p < 0.001).
Comment
With time, survival of any group of patients decreases eventually to zero, and the rate of decrease is influenced by both cardiac and noncardiac factors. In this study we have tried to isolate the impact of BITA grafting on subsequent 20-year survival. If BITA grafting has a positive impact on survival, logic seems to dictate that it would be based on relief of myocardial ischemia, a decrease in frequency of major ischemic episodes, and perhaps improvement of left ventricular function for some
References (14)
- et al.
Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(1999) Comparing apples and oranges
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2002)- et al.
Clinical-pathologic conferenceuse and choice of statistical methods for the clinical study, “superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus”
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2001) - et al.
Differential in vitro response of the human radial artery versus left internal thoracic artery to cerivastatinimplicationis to bypass grafting
Ann Thorac Surg
(2003) - et al.
Statins in coronary bypass surgeryrationale and clinical use
Ann Thorac Surg
(2003) - et al.
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgeryrisk-adjusted survival
Circulation
(1998) - et al.
Benefit of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts over single IMA graft for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting
Circulation
(2001)
Cited by (443)
Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting by pump status in men and women
2024, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryMultiarterial vs Single-Arterial Coronary Surgery: 10-Year Follow-up of 1 Million Patients
2024, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryBilateral internal thoracic artery versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery: A double meta-analytic approach
2024, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryExpert systematic review on the choice of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)
2023, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryCoronary Artery Bypass With Multiarterial Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
2023, Annals of Thoracic Surgery