Epidemiology of Arrhythmias and Conduction Disorders in Older Adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2012.07.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Effects of aging on the conduction system, associated conduction disorders, and bradyarrhythmias

Aging affects the cardiovascular system in multiple ways, including a decrease in compliance of blood vessels through arterial stiffening and thickening, mild left ventricular thickening, and a shift in the balance of early versus late diastolic filling. Many of these changes result, in part, from cardiac cell enlargement with apoptosis of neighboring cells and subsequent fibrofatty infiltration of the myocardium.1 The conduction system of the heart is also affected by the latter, producing

Sinoatrial node

Aging is associated with increased fat and collagen deposition surrounding the sinoatrial (SA) node, which may result in delay of action potential propagation or even complete electrical separation of the node from surrounding tissue. During the course of normal aging, the number of pacemaker cells in the SA node declines significantly after age 60 years, with less than 10% of the cells seen in young adults remaining by age 75 years. Paradoxically, although older adults generally have fewer SA

AV node and the His-Purkinje system

Aging results in varying degrees of calcification of the cardiac skeleton, particularly in the region including the central fibrous body and the left-sided valves (aortic and mitral valve rings). The AV node, AV bifurcation, as well as the proximal left and right bundle branches are located near the central fibrous body, and are thus vulnerable to slowed signal transmission with increasing age-related changes.

The PR interval undergoes a modest but significant prolongation with advancing age. In

Tachyarrhythmias

Tachyarrhythmias form a large heterogeneous group of disorders in older adults. The epidemiology of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the elderly population is discussed in the following sections.

Summary

Aging is associated with a myriad of changes in the cardiac conduction system, some of which manifest in association with cardiovascular disease, and others develop as part of normal aging. These changes include sinus node dysfunction, slowing of AV nodal conduction, left axis deviation, bundle branch blocks, and an increased prevalence of both supraventricular and ventricular premature beats and arrhythmias. LBBB, AF, and sustained VT are particularly predictive of future adverse cardiac

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (66)

  • T.A. Manolio et al.

    Cardiac arrhythmias on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography in older women and men: the Cardiovascular Health Study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1994)
  • J.L. Fleg et al.

    Cardiac arrhythmias in a healthy elderly population: detection by 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography

    Chest

    (1982)
  • J.L. Fleg et al.

    Long-term prognostic significance of ambulatory electrocardiographic findings in apparently healthy subjects 60 years of age

    Am J Cardiol

    (1992)
  • P.A. Wolf et al.

    Secular trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Study

    Am Heart J

    (1996)
  • S.J. Phillips et al.

    Prevalence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in residents of Rochester, Minnesota

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1990)
  • T.S. Tsang et al.

    Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2002)
  • D.W. Kitzman et al.

    Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients ≥65 years of age

    Am J Cardiol

    (2001)
  • L.A. Orejarena et al.

    Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in the general population

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • M.S. Maurer et al.

    Prevalence and prognostic significance of exercise-induced supraventricular tachycardia in apparently healthy volunteers

    Am J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • C. Fisch

    Electrocardiogram in the aged. An independent marker of heart disease?

    Am J Med

    (1981)
  • J.P. Kantelip et al.

    Findings on ambulatory electrocardiologic monitoring in subjects older than 80 years

    Am J Cardiol

    (1986)
  • J.L. Fleg et al.

    Prevalence and prognosis of exercise-induced nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in apparently healthy volunteers

    Am J Cardiol

    (1984)
  • W.S. Aronow et al.

    Usefulness of echocardiographic abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction, paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia, and complex ventricular arrhythmias in predicting new coronary events in patients over 62 years of age

    Am J Cardiol

    (1988)
  • W.B. Kannel et al.

    Sudden coronary death in women

    Am Heart J

    (1998)
  • P. Anversa et al.

    Myocyte cell loss and myocyte cellular hyperplasia in the hypertrophied aging rat heart

    Circ Res

    (1990)
  • R.G. Hiss et al.

    Electrocardiographic findings in 122,043 individuals

    Circulation

    (1962)
  • J. Schwartz et al.

    Aging effects on heart rate variation

    J Gerontol

    (1991)
  • E.A. Byrne et al.

    Role of aerobic capacity and body mass index in the age-associated decline in heart rate variability

    J Appl Physiol

    (1996)
  • R.A. Robergs et al.

    The surprising history of the ‘HRmax=220-age’ equation

    J Exerc Physiol Online

    (2002)
  • B.M. Nes et al.

    Age-predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects: the HUNT fitness study

    Scand J Med Sci Sports

    (2012)
  • V. Adan et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome

    Am Fam Physician

    (2003)
  • G.A. Lamas et al.

    Age and sex bias in pacemaker selection

    Circulation

    (1992)
  • G. Gregoratos

    Permanent pacemakers in older persons

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1999)
  • Cited by (122)

    • Cardiovascular aging

      2022, Beauty, Aging and AntiAging
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures and financial support: The authors have no disclosures or financial conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript to report. All authors contributed to the writing, editing, and content of this manuscript. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services.

    1

    Author contributions: Grant Chow, MD, contributed in drafting and critical revision of the article. Joseph Marine, MD, and Jerome Fleg, MD, critically revised and approved the article for submission.

    View full text