Original Article
Echocardiographic Prevalence of Bicuspid Aortic Valve in the Population

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2006.06.001Get rights and content

Introduction

The exact prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is controversial. We studied the prevalence of BAV using two large independent echocardiographic databases.

Methods

We analyzed 24,265 echocardiograms performed at our academic institution between 1984 and 1998 for various clinical reasons and 1742 echocardiograms that were obtained by screening teenage athletes in Southern California. The total prevalence of BAV was calculated.

Results

The first database revealed a gender distribution of 11,339 (47%) male and 12,926 (53%) female patients. The second database consisted of 1172 (67%) male and 570 (33%) female athletes. The echocardiographic prevalence of BAV was 0.6% in the larger database and 0.5% in the smaller athletic database.

Conclusion

We found the prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in two large databases to be between 0.5% and 0.6%. This figure was consistent across different ages, in both databases.

Introduction

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is one of the most common congenital heart defects. It can progress to aortic stenosis or regurgitation and is associated with higher rates of infectious endocarditis. The exact prevalence of the condition is not known.

The prevalence of BAV was originally estimated from reviews of autopsy series. In the 1920s Lewis and Grant found the prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve to be 1.4% and 0.9%, respectively.1, 2 Roberts later published data supporting the figure of 0.9%.10 Very large studies were closer to the higher figure of 1.2–1.4%.4, 5

In the 1990s studies were first done using echocardiographic screening of asymptomatic populations. One large study in Africa found a considerably lower prevalence of 0.1%.11 However, two smaller but more recent studies found rates between 0.5% and 0.6%.12, 13 The largest study to date combined both methods by analyzing the autopsy reports, medical records and an echocardiographic database involving 44,013 children born in Iceland. This showed an overall prevalence of 0.1%.

The goal of our study was to clarify the actual prevalence of BAV. We have at the University of California, Irvine, a large database of 23,957 echocardiographic studies done for a wide spectrum of diagnoses. We also have a database of 1742 screening echocardiograms done on teenage athletes. Each of these databases is larger than any previously published studies reporting on the echocardiographic prevalence of BAV. The UC Irvine database, by itself, is larger than the largest autopsy series published on this matter (Table 1).

Section snippets

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed two large databases. One included 24,265 echocardiograms performed at our institution ordered by clinicians between 1984 and 1998 for various indications. The echocardiograms were interpreted by different cardiologists at our institution during study period. The diagnosis of BAV was based on visual estimation by the interpreting cardiologists. The second database was from a study of 1742 echocardiograms performed during the screening of a large number of healthy

Results

The first database revealed a gender distribution of 11,339 male (47%) and 12,926 (53%) female patients. The second database consisted of 1172 (67%) male and 570 (33%) female athletes. The echocardiographic prevalence of BAV was 0.6% in the larger database and 0.5% in the smaller athletic database (Table 2). The mean age of patients with BAV in the larger of the two echocardiographic databases was 31.8 ± 14.3 vs. 51.4 ± 18.5 years in those without BAV. The mean age of athletes with BAV was 15.6 ± 3.8

Discussion

Using two large databases we found that the prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve was between 0.5% and 0.6%. This figure matches the results found by two other smaller echocardiographic studies which used prospective screening of children and adolescents.12, 13 It also approximates the results of the two latest autopsy series to be published.7, 8 It is far greater than the 0.1% reported from largest study to date, using medical records, autopsy studies and an echocardiographic database of 44,000

Limitations

Our data were extracted from databases and therefore the study was not prospective. The diagnosis of BAV was not independently verified. The echocardiograms were interpreted by different cardiologists and we cannot determine the inter-observer variability or adherence to established guidelines. The diagnosis of BAV is a subjective diagnosis and dependent on the quality of images. Therefore, the prevalence of BAV could have been underestimated.

Conclusion

We found the prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in two large databases to be between 0.5% and 0.6%. This figure was consistent across different ages, in both databases. The ratio of males to females affected was three or four to one.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (48)

  • Heritability of aortic valve stenosis and bicuspid enrichment in families with aortic valve stenosis

    2022, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    This control group was chosen because individuals were enrolled according to the same familial screening scheme than CAVS families and there is currently no known increase association between non-syndromic mitral valve prolapse and BAV or CAVS, this association being regarded as sporadic [38]. Indeed, in our study, the prevalence of BAV in relatives was in the expected range of a general population (95%CI, 1.3%–4.7%) [4,5]. However, no analysis on CAVS in this control group could be done due to the younger age of the included individuals.

  • Antiphospholipid-negative Sneddon's syndrome: A comprehensive overview of a rare entity

    2022, Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie
    Citation Excerpt :

    Valvular heart disease is the most frequent cardiac feature, with a high frequency of valvular thickening and regurgitation: 32.8% and 40.9% for the aortic valve, and 36.0% and 73.8% for the mitral valve, respectively. Bicuspid aortic valve was reported in 15% of patients vs. 0.6% in the general population [26]. Libman-Sacks endocarditis was commonly observed: 29.5% at baseline and 42.6% at the last echocardiogram (Fig. 6A,B,C,D).

  • Burden of Valvular Heart Diseases in Hispanic/Latino Individuals in the United States: The Echocardiographic Study of Latinos

    2019, Mayo Clinic Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with aortic valve calcification have been identified, there have been no racial differences in the prevalence of these polymorphisms.30 Finally, our estimates of the prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve was in accordance with estimates from other cohorts (0.5%-0.8%).31 Central Americans were found to have a higher prevalence of valvular heart disease than does any other nationality in Hispanics/Latinos.

  • Genetic Disorders Involving Valve Function

    2017, Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine
  • Association of migraine aura with patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysms

    2013, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The higher than expected incidence of heart valve abnormalities particularly bicuspid aortic valve has not previously been shown in migraine. The incidence of bicuspid aortic valve was 3.7% compared with a population prevalence of 0.5–0.8% [31,32]. The incidence of mitral prolapse was 2.5% which is similar to the expected population prevalence of 2% [33,34].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text