Elsevier

Heart Rhythm

Volume 8, Issue 9, September 2011, Pages 1416-1423
Heart Rhythm

Focus issue: Atrial fibrillation: Clinical
Device
Temporal relationship of atrial tachyarrhythmias, cerebrovascular events, and systemic emboli based on stored device data: A subgroup analysis of TRENDS

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.022Get rights and content

Background

The temporal relationship between atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial tachycardia [AT] and atrial fibrillation [AF]) and cerebrovascular events/systemic emboli (CVE/SE) is unknown.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate this relationship using stored AT/AF diagnostic data from implanted devices in patients with and those without AF.

Methods

The TRENDS study enrolled 2,486 patients with an indication for an implantable device, at least one stroke risk factor, and available device data. The current study includes the subgroup of 40 (1.6%) patients enrolled in TRENDS who experienced CVE/SE.

Results

AT/AF was detected prior to CVE/SE in 20 (50%) of 40 patients. Other than average and maximum daily AT/AF burden and duration of device monitoring prior to CVE/SE, no statistically significant differences were found between patients with and those without AT/AF prior to CVE/SE. For the 20 patients with AT/AF detected prior to CVE/SE, 9 (45%) did not have any AT/AF in the 30 days prior to CVE/SE. Therefore, 29 (73%) of 40 patients with CVE/SE had zero AT/AF burden within 30 days prior to CVE/SE. Fourteen (70%) of the 20 patients with AT/AF detected prior to CVE/SE were not in AT/AF at diagnosis of CVE/SE. The last episode of AT/AF in these 14 patients was 168 ± 199 days (range 3–642 days) before CVE/SE.

Conclusion

The majority of CVE/SE in this population did not occur proximal to recent AT/AF episodes. These data imply that the mechanisms of CVE/SE in patients with implantable devices may importantly involve mechanisms other than cardioembolism due to atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Introduction

It is well recognized that atrial fibrillation (AF) promotes thrombus formation in the left atrium and that these thrombi may embolize.1, 2, 3, 4 The rate of ischemic stroke associated with nonvalvular AF averages 5% per year, a rate that is two to seven times that of the general population. However, many risk factors for AF (elderly age, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic disease) are also independent risk factors for ischemic stroke that is not cardioembolic.4, 5 The purpose of this study was to determine the temporal relationship of AF, as detected by implantable cardiac devices, relative to the onset of symptoms of cerebrovascular events/systemic emboli (CVE/SE) in patients with and those without AF.

Section snippets

Study population

The study population consists of the subgroup of 40 patients enrolled in the TRENDS study who experienced CVE/SE and for whom 30 days monitoring prior to CVE/SE was available. In brief, TRENDS was a prospective, observational study that enrolled 2,486 patients with an indication for a pacemaker or a cardioverter-defibrillator and at least one stroke risk factor of heart failure, hypertension, age ≥65 years, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA).6, 7 Physicians were

Detection of AT/AF prior to CVE/SE

Among the 40 patients who experienced CVE/SE, AT/AF was detected, at any time, prior to CVE/SE in 20 patients and was not detected prior to CVE/SE in the remaining 20 patients. Other than the average and maximum daily AT/AF burden and the duration of device monitoring prior to CVE/SE, no statistically significant differences were seen between patients with and those without AT/AF prior to CVE/SE (Table 1). However, because of the small number of patients in this study, the power of this

Main findings

The purpose of the present subgroup analysis of the TRENDS study was to assess the temporal relationship between CVE/SE and atrial tachyarrhythmias in a device population both with and without AT/AF. The two main conclusions of the TRENDS study were that (1) the annualized CVE/SE rate was remarkably low (1.2%) and (2) an AT/AF burden ≥5.5 hours in any 30-day period doubled CVE/SE risk.7 However, in the current study, patient-specific analysis revealed that only 50% of patients who experienced

Conclusion

The incidental finding of AF events recorded by an implanted device is common and poses a clinical challenge because the practical significance is unknown. When considering warfarin therapy, many physicians rely on information on recent AF episodes to impact their decision. This approach may explain, in part, the underutilization of anticoagulation despite its proven benefit28, 29 and the discontinuation of anticoagulation in patients at high risk for stroke who seem to be maintaining sinus

Acknowledgments

Drs. Philip A. Wolf, David Anderson, and José Biller were the neurologists who adjudicated the outcome events.

References (30)

  • R.G. Hart et al.

    Current status of stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation

    Stroke

    (2009)
  • D.G. Sherman et al.

    Occurrence and characteristics of stroke events in the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of sinus rhythm management (AFFIRM) Study

    Arch Intern Med

    (2005)
  • B.F. Gage et al.

    Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • R.J. Adams et al.

    Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack

    Stroke

    (2008)
  • T.V. Glotzer et al.

    Rationale and design of a prospective study of the clinical significance of atrial arrhythmias detected by implanted device diagnostics: the TRENDS study

    J Interv Card Electrophysiol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    The TRENDS study was sponsored by Medtronic, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Christopher Hilker, Jodi Koehler, and Paul D. Ziegler are employees and stockholders of Medtronic, Inc. Drs. Daoud, Glotzer, Wyse, and Ezekowitz served as consultants for Medtronic, Inc.

    View full text