Clinical Research
Intervention in Valve Disease
2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.044Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Background

The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis.

Results

In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration.

Conclusions

The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.

Key Words

aortic valve stenosis
long-term follow-up
transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Abbreviations and Acronyms

AR
aortic regurgitation
EOA
effective orifice area
EuroSCORE
European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation
HRinop
high-risk inoperable
HRop
high-risk operable
MACCE
major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event(s)
MR
moderate risk
NYHA
New York Heart Association
TAVI
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
TIA
transient ischemic attack

Cited by (0)

Drs. Buellesfeld, Gerckens, Schuler, Bonan, Kovac, Serruys, Labinaz, den Heijer, Windecker, and Grube are consultants and/or proctors for Medtronic. Dr. Kovac is a consultant to St. Jude. Dr. Mullen is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Windecker receives lecture and consultant fees from Abbott, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Cordis, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships to disclose. Dr. Buellesfeld and Gerckens contributed equally to this work.