Elsevier

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volume 42, Issue 5, September–October 2009, Pages 426-431
Journal of Electrocardiology

Overcoming barriers to developing seamless ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care systems in the United States: recommendations from a comprehensive Prehospital 12-lead Electrocardiogram Working Group

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.03.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Reducing time to reperfusion treatment for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves patient outcomes. Few medical systems consistently meet current benchmarks regarding timely access to treatment. Studies have widely demonstrated that prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography can facilitate early catheterization laboratory activation and is the most effective means of decreasing patients' time to treatment.

Methods

We gathered experts to examine the barriers to implementation of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring and transmission to in-hospital cardiologists in creating seamless STEMI care systems (STEMI-CS) and propose multidisciplinary approaches to overcoming these barriers.

Results and Conclusions

Physicians, hospital systems, and emergency medical services often lack coordination of care delivery and receive fragmented funding and oversight. Clinical and regulatory guidelines do not emphasize local solutions to achieving clinical benchmarks, do not target incentives at all components of the STEMI-CS, and underemphasize risk-based approaches to protecting patient health. Integration of the multiple complex components involved in STEMI-CS is essential to improving care delivery.

Introduction

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) affects 500 000 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the United States annually.1 The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) are leading a national campaign to improve outcomes by increasing the number of STEMI patients receiving timely reperfusion treatment.2 Their 2004 and updated 2007 guidelines recommend that the interval from first medical contact or emergency department (ED) arrival to primary percutaneous coronary intervention be no longer than 90 minutes or that fibrinolytic therapy be initiated within 30 minutes of hospital arrival.1, 3 A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is the essential screening tool for identifying STEMI, supporting the decision to initiate reperfusion therapies. As such, since 2005, the AHA guidelines for triage of patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain depend upon prehospital 12-lead ECG for diagnosis as follows:

  • (Class I): We recommend implementation of out-of-hospital 12-lead ECG diagnostic programs in urban and suburban emergency medical systems (EMS).4

  • (Class IIa): Routine use of 12-lead out-of-hospital ECG and advance notification is recommended for patients with signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndrome.4

  • (Class IIa): We recommend that out-of-hospital paramedics acquire and transmit either diagnostic quality ECGs or their interpretation of them to the receiving hospital with advance notification of the arrival of a patient with acute coronary syndrome.4

To date, few medical systems have been able to consistently meet these goals. A 2008 study of 254 hospitals participating in the AHA's “Get With the Guidelines” program found that, between 2001 and 2006, only 44.8% of 10 965 patients had door-to-balloon (D2B) times less than or equal to 90 minutes.5 In a 2006 study of 365 hospitals reporting D2B to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the mean D2B time reported was 100.4 ± 23.4 minutes, demonstrating widespread challenges with providing treatment within recommended time intervals.6 In addition, data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4 for 2000 to 2002 indicates that fewer than 10% of patients with STEMI received a prehospital ECG,7 although this figure is likely higher in 2009. Multiple advisory councils and working groups have convened to recommend means of improving guideline adherence in STEMI care, including ones that focused on the optimal use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in expediting reperfusion therapy decision making.2, 6, 8, 9 Recent work by an AHA council has provided a thorough academic assessment of the benefit of implementing prehospital ECGs into systems of care for acute coronary syndromes and has identified some of the barriers that have impeded this effort.9

The creation of an optimized STEMI care system (STEMI-CS) requires the integration of all providers that are involved in caring for the patient with STEMI, including prehospital EMS, ED physicians and staff, cardiologists in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and coronary care unit, and hospital administrators. Methods for integrating prehospital ECGs in early diagnosis vary from training-intensive approaches that allow skilled paramedics the decision-making power to activate a catheterization laboratory to technology-intensive solutions that improve physician-paramedic communication, providing in-hospital physicians immediate access to 12-lead ECGs taken in the field. The strategy of using paramedic interpretation to give advance notification of STEMI to EDs has been shown to reduce door-to-reperfusion time but not consistently below 90 minutes.10 Studies in which prehospital ECGs were transmitted directly to cardiologists for interpretation, while still en route to the hospital, have achieved success in consistently reducing D2B times to below 90 minutes.11, 12 Implementation of these more advanced strategies require EMS systems to be equipped with 12-lead ECG monitoring devices that can transmit ECGs to physicians with high-level ECG reading skills.

Section snippets

Purpose and methods

Our purpose was to examine the barriers to the creation of optimized STEMI-CS systems. We recruited a diverse group of expert clinicians, researchers, EMS personnel, regulatory representatives, industry representatives, health economists, and hospital administrators to a satellite meeting of the 2007 Computers in Cardiology Conference (Durham, NC) to solicit their input in identifying barriers and providing recommendations for removing these obstacles. Before the conference, participants were

Physicians

Advanced STEMI-CS pose staffing and availability burdens for physicians. Providing adequate staffing to allow for 24/7 availability of a cardiologist to interpret an ECG is difficult to achieve in many nonacademic and rural settings and must be addressed. In addition, many current systems depend on emergency physicians to acquire and interpret 12-lead ECGs as a key diagnostic step before reperfusion therapy decision making. Given the high demand on ED physician resources across the United

Hospital Systems

Current financial incentives for achieving 90-minute D2B treatment time, piloted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, seek primarily to influence the economic component of in-hospital care. Clearly, all providers involved in a STEMI-CS incur costs in implementing and maintaining supporting services, systems, and equipment. But hospitals—particularly tertiary centers—substantially benefit from the associated market positioning advantage they derive from an enhanced reputation as

Summary and future goals

Our goal is to optimize the treatment of the patient with STEMI through increasing the use and integration of prehospital 12-lead ECG monitoring in the continuum of care. Improved EMS services and modern communication technologies can potentially eliminate many of the existing barriers that impede timely access to treatment but only when combined with system-wide integration of the providers involved in patient care, in the development of a truly seamless STEMI-CS.

We must strive to overcome the

Acknowledgments

Other members of the Prehospital 12-lead ECG Working Group: Alejandro Barbagelata, Charles Bethea, Peter Clemmensen, John Falletta, James Fee, Anton Gorgels, Martha Horton, Diana Louder, Shen Luo, Randy Merry, Brandon Mitchell, Brian Skelton, Ronald Stickney, Robert Vranian, Robert Welsh, and Joel Xue.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Support for a meeting location and coordination of writing the working group consensus statement was provided by GE Healthcare (Wauwatosa, WI), Philips Healthcare (Andover, MA), Zoll Medical Corporation (Chelmsford, MA), Welch Allyn (Beaverton, OR), and Physio-Control (Redmond, WA).

View full text