Elsevier

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volume 45, Issue 6, November–December 2012, Pages 617-623
Journal of Electrocardiology

A review of the role of electrocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.08.051Get rights and content

Abstract

ECG remains the first line method for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with hypertension. ECG diagnosis of LVH predicts a several-fold increase in age- and risk factor-adjusted cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic patients with essential hypertension. When compared with traditional ECG methods, Cornell voltage product and multifactorial criteria such as the Perugia criterion allow detection of LVH in a higher proportion of subjects while carrying a high attributable risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hence, traditional interpretation of standard ECG maintains an important role for cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertension.

Introduction

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is not only an inevitable adaptation to increased hemodynamic load in hypertension, but also a strong and independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. LVH was first recognized as a complication of hypertension over 150 years ago at autopsy,1 and later by chest X-ray. Over the years, electrocardiography (ECG) has become the first-choice technique for detection of LVH in patients with hypertension due to its wide-scale availability, low cost, repeatability, and established prognostic value. Current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension2., 3. strongly recommend ECG as the only examination to be performed in all hypertensive subjects for detection of LVH. However, the use of ECG as a diagnostic tool in hypertensive subjects is limited by the absence of agreement on which of the many proposed criteria is preferable for diagnosis of LVH, and by its poor sensitivity as compared with other more accurate techniques such as echocardiography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, and, more recently, three-dimensional echocardiography. The present article reviews the diagnostic and prognostic role of ECG as a tool for detecting LVH in hypertension and as a guide for risk stratification of the hypertensive patient.

Section snippets

Diagnostic criteria of LVH

Several dozens of ECG criteria for LVH have been proposed over the decades; some of them are listed in Table 1. After a phase of general passive acceptance, the wide-scale spread of echocardiography allowed to verify the diagnostic accuracy of ECG. As shown in Table 2, the sensitivity of ECG in detecting LVH defined as a LV mass above a given threshold is generally low. Since the prevalence of LVH in unselected subjects with essential hypertension is quite low, a high specificity (i.e.,

Prognostic value of LVH

For any given level of concomitant risk factors, the risk of cardiovascular complications is greater in the subjects with LVH at ECG than in the subjects with normal ECG.51., 52. Moreover, the benefit of antihypertensive treatment is larger in subjects with LVH.53 On the basis of these data, LVH has been accepted as an important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

However, the practical usefulness of ECG as a tool for prognostic stratification is conditioned by the very low

Prognostic significance of LVH regression

It is well known that long-term antihypertensive treatment may influence the time course of LVH. In MRFIT study, the subjects with a more aggressive treatment and a better blood pressure control (special intervention) had a lower incidence of LVH at follow-up, and a more frequent regression of LVH than the subjects with a less intensive treatment (usual care).54 In the setting of the Framingham study,55 the subjects with serial increase or decrease of Cornell voltage during follow-up had a

Conclusions

ECG remains the first line method for detection of LVH in patients with hypertension. ECG diagnosis of LVH predicts a several-fold increase in age- and risk factor-adjusted cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic patients with essential hypertension. When compared with traditional ECG methods, Cornell voltage product and multifactorial criteria such as the Perugia criterion allow detection of LVH in a higher proportion of subjects while carrying a high attributable risk for

References (64)

  • S.O. de Vries et al.

    Prediction of the left ventricular mass from the electrocardiogram in systemic hypertension

    Am J Cardiol

    (1996)
  • E. Abergel et al.

    Influence of obesity on the diagnostic value of electrocardiographic criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy

    Am J Cardiol

    (1996)
  • R.S. Crow et al.

    Relation between electrocardiography and echocardiography for left ventricular mass in systemic hypertension (results from Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study)

    Am J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • J.E. Norman et al.

    Improved electrocardiographic detection of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: results of a correlated data base approach

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1995)
  • P.M. Okin et al.

    Electrocardiographic identification of left ventricular hypertrophy: test performance in relation to definition of hypertrophy and presence of obesity

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1996)
  • L.M. Noble et al.

    Left ventricular hypertrophy in left bundle branch block

    J Electrocardiol

    (1984)
  • P.M. Okin et al.

    Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy by the time-voltage integral of the QRS complex

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1994)
  • R.B. Devereux et al.

    Repolarization abnormalities of left ventricular hypertrophy: clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic correlates

    J Electrocardiol

    (1982)
  • L. Bacharova et al.

    Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: depolarization changes

    J Electrocardiol

    (2009)
  • B. Villari et al.

    Effect of progression of left ventricular hypertrophy on coronary artery dimensions in aortic valve disease

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1992)
  • V. Palmieri et al.

    Reliability of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function: the PRESERVE study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1999)
  • S. MacMahon et al.

    Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and effects of antihypertensive drug therapy in participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

    Am J Cardiol

    (1989)
  • W.B. Kannel

    Prevalence and natural history of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy

    Am J Med

    (1983)
  • P. Verdecchia et al.

    Prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • B.P. Hsieh et al.

    Prognostic value of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy

    Am Heart J

    (2005)
  • S. Kohsaka et al.

    Additional impact of electrocardiographic over echocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy for predicting the risk of ischemic stroke

    Am Heart J

    (2005)
  • P. Verdecchia et al.

    Prognostic value of serial electrocardiographic voltage and repolarization changes in essential hypertension: the HEART Survey study

    Am J Hypertens

    (2007)
  • R. Bright

    Cases and observations, illustrative of renal disease accompanied with the secretion of albuminous urine

    Guy's Hosp Rep

    (1836)
  • A.V. Chobanian et al.

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    J Hypertens

    (2007)
  • T. Lewis

    Observations upon ventricular hypertrophy with special reference to preponderance of one or another chamber

    Heart

    (1914)
  • R. Gubner et al.

    Electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy. Factors determining the evolution of the electrocardiographic patterns in hypertrophy and bundle branch block

    Arch Intern Med

    (1943)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Hypertensive heart disease associated with methamphetamine abuse

      2019, Journal of Cardiology Cases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because our patient developed hypertension after starting methamphetamine abuse 17 years previously, habitual abuse potentially contributed to his hypertension and led to cardiac remodeling represented by concentric hypertrophy [2,6]. His electrocardiograph did not show typical findings of LVH, but it met the Cornell product criteria as a marker of LVH [7]. Methamphetamine is the cause of abnormal histological changes in cardiac tissue.

    • Development and validation of ECG analysis algorithm in mice

      2018, Conn's Handbook of Models for Human Aging
    • Hypertensive Heart Disease

      2017, Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine
    • Prediction of stroke with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis

      2020, Journal of Electrocardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      30 electrocardiographic criteria have been applied to define LVH [8]. The Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell voltage, and Cornell product are the most commonly used the electrocardiographic criteria for detecting LVH [9]. A number of studies [10–16] have reported the association of electrocardiographic LVH and stroke in hypertensive patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The manuscript is original, and no part of it has been or will be submitted elsewhere for publication. Each author has contributed to, read and approved the manuscript.

    View full text