Elsevier

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Volume 51, Issue 2, September–October 2008, Pages 171-182
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Special article
Analysis of Ventricular Performance as a Function of Pacing Site and Mode

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2008.01.001Get rights and content

Emerging data from experimental and clinical studies have shown that right ventricular (RV) apical pacing led to abnormalities of ventricular activation and contraction, and impairment of myocardial perfusion with adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling, which was associated with increased risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. As a result, there is a growing interest in searching for methods to minimize unnecessary RV pacing and preserving normal ventricular activation with alternative ventricular pacing sites. The risk of developing heart failure (HF) after RV apical pacing depends on the interactions between patient-specific factors (baseline atrial rhythm, intrinsic atrioventricular and ventricular conduction, LV ejection fraction, and the presence of HF and myocardial infarction) and pacing-related factors (mode of pacing, site of ventricular pacing, paced QRS duration, and percentage and duration of pacing). In patients with intact atrioventricular conduction, atrial-based pacing should be used to avoid unnecessary ventricular pacing. In patients requiring ventricular pacing, the potential benefits of alternate ventricular pacing sites, such as RV or LV septa, or even biventricular pacing in different patient populations remain unclear and warrant further long-term prospective clinical trial evaluations especially in those patients who are at a higher risk of developing HF after RV apical pacing.

Section snippets

Normal Ventricular Activation and Contraction

Normal cardiac electrical impulses propagate from the AV node to the highly specialized His-Purkinje conduction system to coordinate the contraction of ventricular myocardium.

In general, the electrical activation wavefronts first exit to the LV endocardial cavity at the lower interventricular septum and then propagate in an apicobasal direction because the initial portion of the His-Purkinje system is electrically insulated from the surrounding contractile ventricular myocardium. As a result,

Adverse Hemodynamic Effects of Left Bundle Branch Block

The normal physiologic electrical activation of left ventricle can be disrupted in patients with structural heart diseases, such as dilated cardiomyopathy as manifested by the occurrence of intraventricular conduction defect with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and/or widening of QRS duration. During LBBB, the ventricular activation starts in the right ventricle, and the left ventricle is activated by a slow right-to-left transseptal conduction, which then propagates into the LV cavity at the

Impacts of Ventricular Pacing Modes and Sites on Development of HF

In patients with congenital34 or acquired3, 4, 35 AV block, chronic RV apical pacing can lead to deterioration of LV systolic and diastolic function in up to 31% to 50% of patients. Although the prevalence of abnormal LV function and/or evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony are observed in up to two third of patients after permanent RV apical pacing,6, 35 the incidence of HF after ventricular pacing remains rather low. The risk of developing HF after RV apical pacing depends on the interactions

Optimal Choice of Pacing Mode and Pacing Site

In view of the potential harmful effects of RV apical pacing on LV function, different approaches to the selection of pacing mode and pacing site have been investigated to prevent or attenuate these effects.

Future Perspectives for Cardiac Pacing

The field of cardiac pacing has been changing to a paradigm with new definitions of physiologic ventricular pacing. Future clinical trials on cardiac pacing will be focused on the use of different pacing modes and/or pacing sites to maximize the benefits and minimize the harmful effects to LV function because of artificial cardiac stimulation. First, it is very clear that the normal ventricular conduction should be preserved by avoiding unnecessary RV apical pacing if possible. However, the

References (101)

  • R. Lieberman et al.

    Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • M. Nahlawi et al.

    Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • M.R. Zile et al.

    Right ventricular pacing reduces the rate of left ventricular relaxation and filling

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1987)
  • L.F. Tops et al.

    Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • M.A. Lee et al.

    Effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular perfusion, innervation, function and histology

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1994)
  • E.N. Simantirakis et al.

    Left ventricular mechanics and myocardial blood flow following restoration of normal activation sequence in paced patients with long-term right ventricular apical stimulation

    Chest

    (2003)
  • F.W. Prinzen et al.

    Asymmetric thickness of the left ventricular wall resulting from asynchronous electric activation: a study in dogs with ventricular pacing and in patients with left bundle branch block

    Am Heart J

    (1995)
  • P.P. Karpawich et al.

    Developmental sequelae of fixed-rate ventricular pacing in the immature canine heart: an electrophysiologic, hemodynamic, and histopathologic evaluation

    Am Heart J

    (1990)
  • G. Maurer et al.

    Two-dimensional echocardiographic contrast assessment of pacing-induced mitral regurgitation: relation to altered regional left ventricular function

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1984)
  • O.A. Breithardt et al.

    Acute effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in advanced systolic heart failure

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • H. Kanzaki et al.

    A mechanism for immediate reduction in mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from mechanical activation strain mapping

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • J.J. Hayes et al.

    for the DAVID Investigators: abnormal conduction increases risk of adverse outcomes from right ventricular pacing

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • A.D. Sharma et al.

    for the DAVID Investigators: percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial

    Heart Rhythm

    (2005)
  • H.H. Shukla et al.

    for the Mode Selection Trial (MOST) Investigators: heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration

    Heart Rhythm

    (2005)
  • R. Pap et al.

    Native QRS complex duration predicts paced QRS width in patients with normal left ventricular function and right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block

    J Electrocardiol

    (2007)
  • H.F. Tse et al.

    Selection of permanent ventricular pacing site: how far should we go?

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • H.R. Andersen et al.

    Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome

    Lancet

    (1994)
  • B. Olshansky et al.

    Eliminating right ventricular pacing may not be best for patients requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

    Heart Rhythm

    (2007)
  • H.F. Tse et al.

    Improved atrial mechanical efficiency during alternate- and multiple-site atrial pacing compared with conventional right atrial appendage pacing: implications for selective site pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • B. Schwaab et al.

    Influence of right ventricular stimulation site on left ventricular function in atrial synchronous ventricular pacing

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1999)
  • E. Occhetta et al.

    Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • M. Peschar et al.

    Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • E.N. Simantirakis et al.

    Left ventricular mechanics during right ventricular apical or left ventricular-based pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • M. Kindermann et al.

    Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPacing Clin Electrophysiol)

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • L.F. Tops et al.

    Speckle-tracking radial strain reveals left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing

    J Am Coll Cardiol.

    (2007)
  • K.L. Lee et al.

    First human demonstration of cardiac stimulation with transcutaneous ultrasound energy delivery: implications for wireless pacing with implantable devices

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2007)
  • S. Furman et al.

    An intracardiac pacemaker for Stokes-Adams seizures

    N Engl J Med

    (1959)
  • C. Wiggers

    The muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial stimuli

    Am J Physiol

    (1925)
  • S.D. Thackray et al.

    The prevalence of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical regional pacemaker population

    Eur Heart J

    (2003)
  • J.C. Nielsen et al.

    Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing

    Circulation

    (1998)
  • B.L. Wilkoff et al.

    Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • M.O. Sweeney et al.

    Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • M.H. Draper et al.

    Cardiac resting and action potentials recorded with an intracellular electrode

    J Physiol

    (1951)
  • D. Durrer et al.

    Total excitation of the isolated human heart

    Circulation

    (1970)
  • D.M. Cassidy et al.

    Endocardial mapping in humans in sinus rhythm with normal left ventricles: activation patterns and characteristics of electrograms

    Circulation

    (1984)
  • J.A. Vassallo et al.

    Endocardial activation of left bundle branch block

    Circulation

    (1984)
  • G.S. Nelson et al.

    Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • C.L. Grines et al.

    Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony

    Circulation

    (1989)
  • Y. Juilliere et al.

    Additional predictive value of both left and right ventricular ejection fractions on long-term survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

    Eur Heart J

    (1997)
  • Y. Koga et al.

    Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic findings in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

    Heart Vessels

    (1993)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Outcomes in patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular dyssynchrony following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

      2023, Heart Rhythm
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the PACE (Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement) trial, high-burden RV pacing (>97%) resulted in the development of cardiomyopathy in 9% of patients.16 In addition, TAVR frequently is complicated by the development of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), which is associated with adverse hemodynamic effects due to LV dyssynchrony.18 New persistent or permanent LBBB may impact LV function and has been associated with increased need for PPM implantation and higher mortality.19–23

    • The impact of paced QRS duration on the expression of genes related to contractile function of the left ventricle in chronically paced patients from the right ventricular apex

      2020, Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patient-specific factors comprise the presence of intrinsic AV and ventricular conduction disturbances, baseline atrial rhythm, LV ejection fraction (EF), presence of heart failure (HF) and/or coronary artery disease (CAD) at the time of implantation. Pacing-related factors include the mode of pacing, site of ventricular lead, duration of paced QRS, percentage of ventricular pacing and duration of pacing.2,3 We hypothesized that duration of paced QRS could serve as an index of the assynchrony induced by RV apical pacing.

    • Adverse effects of left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony on cardiac reverse remodeling and prognosis after aortic valve surgery

      2018, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The hemodynamic and mechanical disadvantages of right ventricular (RV) apical pacing are similar to those of LBBB [6]. RV apical pacing induces dyssynchrony, which leads to increased sympathetic activation, causes abnormalities in myocardial perfusion, and worsened hemodynamic parameters and myocardial remodeling [6–8]. However, evidence for the clinical impact of ED after aortic valve surgery remains scarce.

    • Effect of left ventricular pacing mode and site on hemodynamic, torsional and strain indices

      2016, Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ventricular pacing at any site may have an adverse effect on pump function. However, among all LV pacing sites the LV apex generally results in the best maintenance of pump function, in non-ischemic animal hearts and when pacing is applied outside the necrotic region.2,7,12,23–28 Ventricular pacing at the apex or lateral wall suffers from the lack of the “atrial kick,” which produces a significant reduction in LV systolic pressure in the ischemic myocardium.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text